RE: More Sorce Control

2006-03-28 Thread Rich Kroll
, 2006 2:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: More Sorce Control Hi Rich, You need to consider using branches. These let you isolate a set of changes from the trunk. A branch can be developed and tested and QA'd separately then when signed off can be merged back to the trunk. At this point it does need

Re: More Sorce Control

2006-03-28 Thread Barney Boisvert
The main difference would be that you now have to think across the version tree as well, rather than only along it. Your QA people still check out a specific name (it'll be a branch, not a tag), and test it, so their job doesn't change. The difference will be with the cross-dependancies. To

RE: More Sorce Control

2006-03-28 Thread Rich Kroll
, March 28, 2006 7:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: More Sorce Control Regarding your different workspaces, every developer and QA person should have their own personal working directory checked out. The QA people will be switching their working directories between branches all the time, while

Re: More Sorce Control

2006-03-27 Thread Michael Traher
Hi Rich, You need to consider using branches. These let you isolate a set of changes from the trunk. A branch can be developed and tested and QA'd separately then when signed off can be merged back to the trunk. At this point it does need retesting because of an subsequent changes. Small issues