> Just because CFMX lets you do this, I wouldn't necessarily recommend that
> you do it, because of exactly these sorts of backwards-compatibility
issues.
i recall it being the other way round going from 3.x to 4.x, near broke my
heart ;-)
> It looks like a large hosting company like Affinity would update
> their darned servers at some point.
>
> Crap - I got this stuff on close to 600 pages. ARGH!!
Just because CFMX lets you do this, I wouldn't necessarily recommend that
you do it, because of exactly these sorts of backwards
ber 19, 2003 5:05 AM
Subject: RE: Multiply in Output Statement??
> > I've been building some admin pages that have stuff like:
> >
> > #myrecord.myvar * 100#
> >
> > This runs perfectlly locally, but once out on the server...
~
>This syntax is valid in CFMX, but not in most earlier versions of CF. In
>those versions, you can only wrap single variables or functions within pound
>signs. You can work around this by using the Evaluate function to evaluate
>the expression.
>
>
It looks like a large hosting company like Affi
> I've been building some admin pages that have stuff like:
>
> #myrecord.myvar * 100#
>
> This runs perfectlly locally, but once out on the server...
This syntax is valid in CFMX, but not in most earlier versions of CF. In
those versions, you can only wrap single variables or functions within
5 matches
Mail list logo