Actually, I still fire up sql plus for some things - updating passwords, for
example is so much easier if just done from a command line. Of course, for
things like moving data between schemas, TOAD wins hands down.
On 3/14/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Munson, Jacob wrote:
>
wow, thats a surprise :)
tw
On 3/14/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Munson, Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Right. But before this came out, you had what...SQL+ or whatever it's
> > called? Everybody, if you like doing SQL work from a command line,
> > raise your hand.
>
> /me raises ha
Munson, Jacob wrote:
>
> Right. But before this came out, you had what...SQL+ or whatever it's
> called? Everybody, if you like doing SQL work from a command line,
> raise your hand.
/me raises hand
I haven't used SQL+ in ages, but do recent versions support tab
autocomplete, shell integratio
>> Everybody, if you like doing SQL work from a command line,
>> raise your hand.
>
> I don't know if I like it, but I do rely on it - you may or
> may not have GUI
> access to a database, but you almost always have access through a
> command-line interface.
Yeah, good point. SQL*Plus is a good
> Everybody, if you like doing SQL work from a command line,
> raise your hand.
I don't know if I like it, but I do rely on it - you may or may not have GUI
access to a database, but you almost always have access through a
command-line interface.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.fig
Didn't Oracle release some sort of Visual Studio plugin awhile back or have
I been hitting the old crack pipe too much lately? Keep thinking it had
something to do with Oracle XE
On 3/14/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no way this tool looks anything like SQL Server's
> There is no way this tool looks anything like SQL Server's
> tool. The IDE of SQL Server 2005 also comes with a specific
> version of Visual Studio for SQL Server to design reports and
> to make SSIS(sql server integration services replaces DTS).
> It's a good start for Oracle and it will all
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:06, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> > I've been using this since it was code-named Raptor. Its nice, beats
> Last time I looked, it didn't have working insight or storage of user
> scripts.
:downloads
Nope, Oracle still can't write shell scripts
:hacks
. time passes
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 14:50, Douglas Knudsen wrote:
> I've been using this since it was code-named Raptor. Its nice, beats
Last time I looked, it didn't have working insight or storage of user scripts.
> AquaDataStudio
ADS looks nicer to me.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programme
I use quite a bit of the features in my version here which is not the full
blown one that has the DBA stuff. Admitedly I probably do not even use a
1/3rd of all the features the tool has though. I find it extrememely
helpful to use for things like writing custom functions and stored
procedures.
> I'd say that Oracle is competing with Microsoft by releasing this.
> SQL
> server 2005 comes with Management Studio which looks a LOT like
> Oracle's
> new tool. Toad is a 3rd party tool that is not free. Many companies
> trying to decide between Oracle and SQL Server might choose SQL
> Ser
I am going to have to download this tool again. When I got it in beta it
was "ok" but did not leave me with the impression of having near the
abilities of what the tools for MSSQL 2005 give.
I am surprised people are complaining about Toad crashing. I honestly can
not think of a time my Toad has
yeah, and for a web app developer, just how many of these uber rich
features that cost so much do you really use? A DBA might use them,
yes.
That said, our DBA here has been in contact with Quest for awhile,
even gets beta releases. He's seen bugs get fixed and reintroduced
again in a later vers
> it's nice that Oracle has finally released a tool
> to compete with TOAD.
I'd say that Oracle is competing with Microsoft by releasing this. SQL
server 2005 comes with Management Studio which looks a LOT like Oracle's
new tool. Toad is a 3rd party tool that is not free. Many companies
trying
Really? We're recent converts to TOAD from sql nav, and we're super happy.
It occasionally throws an error for me, but not very often. And, the feature
set is uber rich. If you're having problems, I suggest you join the yahoo
group and provide some feedback to the developers. Suggestions are usuall
+1 for Toad getting to be a right pain in the rear, I'm lucky if I get an
hours solid use out of it and don't get me started on the menu structure...
On 3/14/06, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using this since it was code-named Raptor. Its nice, beats
> AquaDataStudio fo
I've been using this since it was code-named Raptor. Its nice, beats
AquaDataStudio for sure in my book. We have many Toad licenses around
here, but Toad seems to be getting buggy and flaky as time goes on.
And its not cheap.
DK
On 3/14/06, Robert Everland III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Orac
17 matches
Mail list logo
