Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook

2006-01-03 Thread Raymond Camden
Oh. Duh. Yeah - that kind of makes sense now. Thanks Rick/Sean. As just an FYI. I'm working on the site right now. (Using Model-Glue of course.) I hope to have a basic shell up by end of week so folks can start submitting content. On 1/3/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps the

RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook

2006-01-03 Thread Rick Faircloth
od (CF solutions) in that style (framework)... Rick > -Original Message- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:14 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook > > > I'm not sure how fr

Re: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook

2006-01-02 Thread Raymond Camden
I'm not sure how frameworks may come into play. Note I'm thinking of small, atomic type problems. Looping over an array - sending form results to an email address - reading a file line by line, etc. -r On 1/2/06, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/2/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook

2006-01-02 Thread Sean Corfield
On 1/2/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Consider categorizing the solutions by CF version > as well as difficulty, e.g. easy, intermediate, difficult. And perhaps categorizing by framework use as well since that will be a useful yardstick for many developers. Fusebox, Mach II, Mode

RE: SPAM-LOW: ColdFusion Cookbook

2006-01-02 Thread Rick Faircloth
Hi, Ray... Sounds like a great idea. Consider categorizing the solutions by CF version as well as difficulty, e.g. easy, intermediate, difficult. I'm sure there are other ways to categorize the cookbook information, too, but those were the first ideas that popped into my mind... Rick > -O