riginal Message-
From: Baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Fri Feb 03 15:14:27 2006
Subject: RE: SQL Encapsulation?
Hi Gang,
Found your messages in my Junk Mail - was wondering why no-one responded!
Brian you're right on all fronts. The example I gave was a paging one, but
TED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Encapsulation?
Well, we were both interpreting your request a bit incorrectly then.
But, I'm not sure I have an answer for you on this one. It's not something
I'd do. I'd be more apt to make a view that &qu
representations of the
> same base.
>
> So SQL being a form of code like any other, should be re-used and
> encapsulated like any other. It doesn't seem proper to have to find and
> paste the same changes in 15-20 methods just because a little logic in the
> SQL changes.
>
>
a little logic in the
SQL changes.
Thoughts?
Baz
-Original Message-
From: Brian Peddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 9:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Encapsulation?
I was basing my assumptions on writing these same things over and over from
job to job for p
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Encapsulation?
Well, first of all, I didn't read his initial question to be one of
pagination, which is what you're implying. I read it as one of reusing query
results in multiple ways. In that scenario, you could very easi
l get him what he wants.
> >
> > He has query #1 which will get the total records for a query.
> > Query #2 just returns 50 records of the total.
> >
> > So when you display results you see.
> >
> > Total: Records 4530 Displaying Records: 101-150.
>
, February 02, 2006 2:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Encapsulation?
pseudo-code...
Select blah blah
From Blah blah
WHERE blah blah
select *
from
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: SQL Encapsulation?
>
> I'd go the cfc route, where I would instantiate a single CFC that would
> run
> your base query with all your where and from clauses.
cords just to display 50 he is
just bringing back what he needs.
-Original Message-
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Encapsulation?
I'd go the cfc route, where I would instantiate a single CFC that
I'd go the cfc route, where I would instantiate a single CFC that would run
your base query with all your where and from clauses. Then, I'd have
multiple functions that would do query of query against that base query.
~|
Message:
I just rewrote a query as a test a few weeks ago that replaced what you have
below. The search would query for a count first then grab the 50/100 etc
records to be displayed for paging.
When someone queried the whole database it was taking upwards of 50 seconds
to run both queries.
I moved them
11 matches
Mail list logo
