> It's interesting that this issue has not come up until we
> deployed multiple instances.
My guess is that it's the session replication of an empty session object
that's causing the problem.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest calib
d multiple
instances.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Solved: division by 0 error
>
> If you clear SESSION itself you're asking for trouble.
>
> Try
#2 would be nice... I think the technote explains how to do structclear
without killing the session...
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:55 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Solved: division by 0 err
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Solved: division by 0 error
I think I got it. On logout, we were using structClear(session), and while
working on a workaround, I coincidentally came to the livedocs for
structClear, which mention never to use it on se
> So my question is what is the correct way to kill a session?
If you simply want to disconnect the session from the user's browser, just
delete the session cookie and let the session itself expire normally. If
you're concerned about memory usage, you could delete everything from the
session that'
I think I got it. On logout, we were using structClear(session), and while
working on a workaround, I coincidentally came to the livedocs for
structClear, which mention never to use it on session. There is a technote
that explains that it deletes the cfid/cftoken/jsessionid and that's bad...
ht
6 matches
Mail list logo
