RE: The Verbosity of CFOUTPUT

2003-06-26 Thread Barney Boisvert
I'm not sure this is true with CFMX any more, because of precompilation, although I could be wrong. It might change with RedSky as well, because I think MM did some stuff with the compilation cycle, but again, I'm not sure. The reason I say this is because the evaluation of what has to be parsed

Re: The Verbosity of CFOUTPUT

2003-06-26 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 12:02 US/Pacific, Rich Z wrote: I am a big fan and advocate of CFML, but I have to confess, I've grown so tired of wrapping cfoutput tags around values like CFOUTPUT#this#/CFOUTPUT. Now I know I could put Cfoutputs at the top and bottom of my page (or block) and

RE: The Verbosity of CFOUTPUT

2003-06-26 Thread Rich Z
Ah. Didn't know that things changed since MX. Very cool (and much less painful, heh). Thanks for the link also - very useful. -Rich -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: The Verbosity of CFOUTPUT