> I just don't understand why we have to keep putting along in our nice new
> Virtual Ford Focus, when the Virtual Boss
> 302 Mustang is just a few clicks away. Yeah, it's going to use more gas, but
> it will be more responsive and every
> user/application will benefit from it.
First: if you si
On 4/15/2012 11:22 AM, Justin Hansen wrote:
>> Of course, we can always go back and optimize code, but at some point
>> you reach a point of diminishing returns. Focusing our programming
>> resources on less than 0.1% of the code... wouldn't it just be less
>> expensive to throw some (virtually f
eah, it's going to use more gas, but it will be more responsive and
every user/application will benefit from it.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 12:30 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: VM Resources
> For those of you using vi
as Dave said, not enough info and too generic a question, you should check
the server monitor or fusionReactor to see how much memory CF is
using.atany time to get a better idea of what the requirements are. I
can tell you
that a typical cf site will run happily on a VM with 2GB RAM and 1 core, in
> For those of you using virtual servers, how much CPU/RAM are you allocating
> to run your CF applications?
That is too general a question to get a useful answer.
> The IT department says we don't need more power because, statistically
> (according to the VM tools), we don't need it.
> Howeve
5 matches
Mail list logo
