Re: which is better - cfx_image or cfimage?

I have also seen random issues with CFimage in 8 and 9, where it will not load an image due to image format. Things like the color map used for a jpg. Cfx_image seems to be able to handle most conversions more gracefully. Byron Mann Lead Engineer & Architect HostMySite.com On May 19, 2014 11:42

Re: which is better - cfx_image or cfimage?

Cfimage has performance issues and tends to break down under load esp on shared servers. So even if you are not putting it under load, is anyone else? I don't think we have had any issues from customers using cfx_image Russ Michaels www.michaels.me.uk cfmldeveloper.com cflive.net cfsearch.com On

Re: Which is better?

Cool, this was more or less just a preformance (which would you do in this situation) question. Thanks for the responses :) On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:09:26 -0500, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one word...Verity :) > > DK > > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:38 -0600, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL

Re: Which is better?

one word...Verity :) DK On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:38 -0600, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quick question... > I'm wanting to do a keyword search would be it best to > A. have one huge text field (varchar2 or clob) and search using like > '%keyword%' > or > B. set up the database w

Re: Which is better?

The latter will almost certainly be faster, probably by a large margin. However, the former will be far simpler to set up and maintain. How about option C, create a full text index on your CLOB from option A, and use that? I know SQL Server and MySQL both support such indexes, I'd imagine others

RE: Which is better?

EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2001 3:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Which is better? > why not just run a query on that page? Every time your application has to retrieve data from an external datasource, be it a SQL database or page fetched with CFHTTP, you increase the page execut

RE: Which is better?

> why not just run a query on that page? Every time your application has to retrieve data from an external datasource, be it a SQL database or page fetched with CFHTTP, you increase the page execution time dramatically and increase your reliance on external devices such as the network, the server

RE: Which is better?

> Which is better in this situation: using application variables or cfcache? I like to use CFCACHE because it obviates the need to lock access to Application variables. However, there are some times where you will want to have more control over when or with what frequency a cached query is repopu

Re: Which is better?

why not just run a query on that page? - Original Message - From: sebastian palmigiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:38 AM Subject: Which is better? > > > Which is better in this situation: using application variables or cfcache? >

Re: Which Is Better?

I'm not following your application that well, so take my comments with a grain of salt. I started out to use an application-scoped structure to put my database in RAM, but abandoned it because cached queries were faster and simpler. However, this was probably because I simply put the database

RE: Which is better??

Thank you very much. That was a great explanation of each! Have a great day! Bill > -Original Message- > From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 9:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Which is better?? > > > What y

Re: Which is better??

What you have defined suggests session variables. One good way to determine which scope to use is to consider: how long the variables should remain (make sense) in the system what is the broadest level to which they apply (will every visitor see the same value or will each have an uniq