RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread Matthew Fusfield
We are using Windows Server 2003 Web Edition with ColdFusion MX 6.1 standard; similar setup to you in that it is a 1U hooked up to a more powerful database server. Works really well and we like Win2k3 overall. Matt -Original Message- From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread cfhelp
From what I have been told from a Microsoft Rep if you are an Internet service provider (WebHost) you are supposed to be running Web Addition. This is because it is a stripped down version and does not require any CALs. The full version will require CALs for all users accessing the server including

Re: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread Doug White
w Fusfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?] | We are using Windows Server 2003 Web Edition with ColdFusion MX 6.1 | stan