Re: cfx_pwcardcrypt (was: encrypt credit card field?)

2001-06-24 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:59:16 -0500, "Tom Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >well lets say I wanted to order it... I notice the site is not secure for >credit card info... why is this? Hi Tom, The "Register" page - where you enter credit card details - is protected by a 128 bit secure certific

Re: cfx_pwcardcrypt (was: encrypt credit card field?)

2001-06-22 Thread Tom Davison
well lets say I wanted to order it... I notice the site is not secure for credit card info... why is this? Tom - Original Message - From: "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:48 AM Subject: R

Re: cfx_pwcardcrypt (was: encrypt credit card field?)

2001-06-21 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:13:33 +1000, "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >4) It is relatively inexpensive considering its power and usefulness >(AUD$50.00 - about US$20.00 or there abouts). While all your other very flattering comments are in fact true (thank you - I can see the tag bl

RE: cfx_pwcardcrypt (was: encrypt credit card field?)

2001-06-21 Thread Peter Tilbrook
Regarding this tag - it is very good for these reasons. 1) It's fast: For the actual credit card checking, even using the full 2048 bit keys it is almost instantaneous. Generating the keys in the first place takes a while (depending on the level of encryption you require) but you sh

Re: cfx_pwcardcrypt (was: encrypt credit card field?)

2001-06-21 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:48:37 -0400, Bud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Cool. Are there any licensing caveats? I purchased CFX_PGP a year or >so ago, built some nice stuff to use it, and then find out it's >16,000 for a PGP commercial license. Hi Bud, No, the whole reason we built it was because PGP