RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
Ok, forget the content type guru's part. I now officially open this thread up so anyone can respond... Please... ~Brad -Original Message- From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:49 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: urlencoded content type Ok, you content type

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Peterson, Chris
Why would anyone in a coldfusion list be able to / desire to help you with a http content question?? You are in the wrong place buddy Chris -Original Message- From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:13 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: urlencoded content

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
basic principles before I bored anyone with the details of my specific problem. ~Brad -Original Message- From: Peterson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: urlencoded content type Why would anyone in a coldfusion list be able

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Peterson, Chris
You could always try cf-community, or #coldfusion on Dalnet. Chris -Original Message- From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: urlencoded content type Well, if it makes you feel any better, you were a last resort. I've

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
, 2008 1:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: urlencoded content type You could always try cf-community, or #coldfusion on Dalnet. ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Peterson, Chris
] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: urlencoded content type You could always try cf-community, or #coldfusion on Dalnet. ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
From: Peterson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess I was just givin ya crap because the problem as stated had nothing at all to do with coldfusion. Maybe you should just include the entire problem? ;) Chris I thought about that,

Re: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Wil Genovese
ok, I looked at your sample http post. Total crap IMHO. But we must eat crap at times. Ignore the form scope. Since this is passed as a query string on the URL use cgi.query_sting as your raw data and parse the real XML portion into it's own string the use CF's xml functions to convert

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
-Talk Subject: Re: urlencoded content type ok, I looked at your sample http post. Total crap IMHO. But we must eat crap at times. Ignore the form scope. Since this is passed as a query string on the URL use cgi.query_sting as your raw data and parse the real XML portion into it's own string

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Dave Watts
I thought about that, and I have a theory that states the likelyhood of getting a reply on the talk list decreases as the length/complexity/details of your question grow. Well, uh, yeah. This isn't a theory, it's a simple observation. Here's the problem: The post sent by this program uses

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Dave Watts
Is the following (simplified) HTTP post valid? Please note the content type is set to application/x-www-form-urlencoded, yet the XML request parameter is NOT url encoded. No, it's not valid. Or, more accurately, it's not well-formed. Furthermore it has an ampersand () which makes it

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
Well, uh, yeah. This isn't a theory, it's a simple observation. Lol. You crack me up. That is why I started out with a simple question to ease into the conversation. What happens if you access the request body directly, using CF's GetHttpRequestData function? Hmmm, now we're talking. Let

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
No, it's not valid. Or, more accurately, it's not well-formed. Ok, good so far. That's not a problem, though, since the ampersand is properly escaped: amp; I disagree. The ampersand has been escaped properly for inclusion in an XML document. The XML has NOT been url encoded. It SHOULD be:

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Dave Watts
I disagree. The ampersand has been escaped properly for inclusion in an XML document. The XML has NOT been url encoded. OK, that's a fair cop. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Brad Wood
Ok, I think I'm in business. The struct returned by GetHttpRequestData() has a key called content which is equal to the body of the HTTP request. I had forgotten this little guy existed but it is exactly what I need. Thanks, Dave. Anyone want to guess what underlying Java method is used to get

RE: urlencoded content type

2008-06-12 Thread Dave Watts
Anyone want to guess what underlying Java method is used to get that data? In a JSP, you'd use request.getInputStream() if I recall correctly. Since the Apache Jakarta fileupload library came out, though, I haven't had to deal with that, so I could be wrong. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software