On 8/30/07, Gert Franz wrote:
:-)
It's like in Die Hard:
The Stockholm syndrome
Like Stockholm Finnland?
No Stockholm - Sweden
Hehe, that actually sounded funny when I typed it, but I'm glad you
got what I meant. =]
their code for performance, since it's our business. Railo helps,
Sean wrote:
I will, of course, try BD 7.0.1, but would
request that you try the Mac install with Apple's Java 6 Developer
Preview (as well as the regular Java 5). Thanx!
Will do. We've added this to our project plan.
Vince Bonfanti
http://www.newatlanta.com
Ha! You Swedes! =)
It's amazing how fast you guys have been rolling out this stuff.
Maybe it's just my floaty perception, but it seems like- wow!
kudos.
On 8/27/07, Gert Franz wrote:
Well, beeing from Switzerland is not allways good. At least our german
is better. But we will update it
:-)
It's like in Die Hard:
The Stockholm syndrome
Like Stockholm Finnland?
No Stockholm - Sweden
Thanks for the praise. In our opinion bad performance is a bug... And we
allways try to improve. We have many customers that want as analyze
their code for performance, since it's our business.
Stylo,
you're right. In order to have unlimited web contexts available in Railo
you would need the Railo Professional unlimited for 1100$.
How a web context is defined can be read here:
http://www.railo.ch/en/index.cfm?treeID=333
The number of virtual hosts is not important. But the number of
Sean wrote:
Did you actually run the suite of unit tests that comes with Transfer
to ensure compatibility or did you just run the tBlog sample app?
We're running the CFUnit tests that come with Transfer (so we also had to make
sure CFUnit runs on BD). BTW, Transfer will only run on the
Stylo,
you're right. In order to have unlimited web contexts available in Railo
you would need the Railo Professional unlimited for 1100$.
What is Professional Unlimited? Is that different from the Enterprise version?
I don't see any information on the site about this version, and the
On 8/29/07, Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're running the CFUnit tests that come with Transfer (so we also had to
make sure CFUnit runs on BD). BTW, Transfer will only run on the Java/J2EE
versions of BD; it won't run on BD.NET because Transfer relies too much on
Java features
On 8/27/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, I know for me, one killer function that is missing
is the support for CFX tags.
Hmm, I've never needed to use a C++ tag with CFML. I think I've only
used one Java CFX tag ever.
What sort of killer C++ CFX tags are you folks using?
--
Sean Corfield wrote:
Hmm, I've never needed to use a C++ tag with CFML. I think I've only
used one Java CFX tag ever.
What sort of killer C++ CFX tags are you folks using?
I'd go along with that - I've often found myself removing CFX tags which
were purely in use as a 'quick fix'. Such as
Sean Corfield wrote:
What sort of killer C++ CFX tags are you folks using?
the only C++ cfx tag i ever see these days is one from esri to talk to it's
arcIMS map server product. we stopped using it years ago in favor of CFC
wrapping up a java connector that does more or less the same thing but
I am of the same opinion. The decision to support C++ tags by Railo is
made by the requests from the community. And by now we had around 5
requests for this feature.
The way of implementation for us is clear. But it takes time we have not
at the moment since other things on our list need to be
: Railo 2 Released
On 8/27/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, I know for me, one killer function that is missing
is the support for CFX tags.
Hmm, I've never needed to use a C++ tag with CFML. I think I've only
used one Java CFX tag ever.
What sort of killer C++ CFX tags are you folks
like BlueDragon, it does not support Transfer ORM
which is a deal-breaker for me since I use that framework on all of my
projects.
Hi Sean,
Transfer ORM is supported in BD 7.0.1. We're wrapping up testing this week and
plan to release a public beta next week.
Vince Bonfanti
Gert - good point there.
On 8/27/07, Gert Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why is there querySetCell().
You can use qry.age[1] = 50 as well.
Or why in other engines there is a ListFind() but no ArrayFind()? Or a
ListToArray() but no ListToStruct() or ArrayToStruct()?
Our function matrix
CFX_ImageFlare is a really good imaging tag written in C++ which I highly
recommend.
Andrew.
~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the What's New PDF now
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
CFX_ImageFlare is a really good imaging tag written in C++ which I highly
recommend.
Andrew.
~|
Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder,
plug-ins for Eclipse
Subject: RE: Railo 2 Released
Not if Railo has imaging built into it like CF8 has.
Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: Railo 2 Released
CFX_ImageFlare is a really good imaging tag written in C++ which I highly
recommend.
Andrew.
~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the What's New PDF now
http
On 8/28/07, Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transfer ORM is supported in BD 7.0.1. We're wrapping up testing this week
and plan to release a public beta next week.
That's good to know Vince, thank you!
Did you actually run the suite of unit tests that comes with Transfer
to ensure
My take is that for $300 you can run unlimited virtual hosts. Seems like a
pretty fair price to me. Now, am I wrong?
Seems wrong because you have to pay an extra $100/web, they say. So running 5
sites means $700, etc.
By default with the Professional Version a single web (webapp) can be
I've been trying figure out their licensing, as I've been testing the RC
version but I think with the pro version (1 web context), it's similar to the
CF server installation. You run unlimited virtual hosts under the single web
context. The limitation being that all the Railo setting are global
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
That's not true about the 6.1 compatibility.
The new version has basically been benchmarked against CF 7.02, which
was the current version when the bulk of Railo 2 was developed. Some
features have been extended or improved beyond the CF 7 spec
Then why is there querySetCell().
You can use qry.age[1] = 50 as well.
Or why in other engines there is a ListFind() but no ArrayFind()? Or a
ListToArray() but no ListToStruct() or ArrayToStruct()?
Our function matrix containing the functions regarding lists, structs,
arrays and queries is as
: Monday, 27 August 2007 8:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Railo 2 Released
Oh,
I just read that, never bothered as I thought Community meant that it would
have to be a community ie NON commercial website.
But reading the page, this doesn't seem to be the case.
They could do themselves
Hi Sean,
yes there are still some things we work on. As you may know I am working
hard on getting Transfer running. I'll blog about that.
We are and were very busy with the 2.0 relaunch. So it just needs some time.
Greetings / Grüsse
Gert Franz
Customer Care
Railo Technologies GmbH
[EMAIL
Yes it does. And we just need the time to implement the functionality.
But it definitely is on our list.
You are not the first to mention.
Thanks
Greetings / Grüsse
Gert Franz
Customer Care
Railo Technologies GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.railo.ch
Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer
Well, beeing from Switzerland is not allways good. At least our german
is better. But we will update it day by day and try to get rid of all
spelling errors.
Greetings / Grüsse
Gert Franz
Customer Care
Railo Technologies GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.railo.ch
Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie
that difficult?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
Yes Rick, you wer right.
We haven't flushed the cache so we had some Errors regarding our current
level of compatibility.
Thanks
The main thing that bugs me is CFX tags they have to be java based not
C++. which rules out a lot of useful CFX tags out there.
I'm glad to hear they are working on this, when it comes to doing ecommerce,
many of the CFX tags are more than just useful, they are essential depending on
the
: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
Well, beeing from Switzerland is not allways good. At least our german
is better. But we will update it day by day and try to get rid of all
spelling errors.
Greetings / Grüsse
If they cut the price by about 50%, I might be interested.
I just can't see paying at least for Railo Pro, which only
compares to CFML 6.1, for what I would pay for the full pro
version of CF 8 from Adobe... the original.
Well, that's if you look at the Enterprise version...but is that what most
anyone would go this route. Again, if the
price were considerably less that CF 8 from Adobe, then maybe I could
see going this way...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: David Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Railo 2 Released
to be fair in my arguments, which I think I am
concerning their price vs features position...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: David Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 5:24 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
That's not true about the 6.1 compatibility
As Mary Jo pointed out, I may not be their target customer, but they've
tried
to sell me on their product directly before and I just can't see paying
more for less... paying less for less, we'll that's a different story and
the
way it should be to me. I'd have to modify the way I code somewhat
There are some interesting things there - and some odd things. For
example, queryGetCell. Why would someone do this:
queryGetCell(qry,'age',1)
when you could just do
qry['age'][1]
On 8/26/07, David Low [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true about the 6.1 compatibility.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
As Mary Jo pointed out, I may not be their target customer, but they've
tried
to sell me on their product directly before and I just can't see paying
more for less... paying less for less, we'll that's a different story and
the
way it should be to me. I'd
: Railo 2 Released
Yes, I can definitely see some use for that, especially when
I have a client that wants to run my CF apps on their own server.
It's much easier to sell them on $300 than $1300...
-Original Message-
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 27 August 2007 3:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Railo 2 Released
Yes, I can definitely see some use for that, especially when
I have a client that wants to run my CF apps on their own server.
It's much easier
://dalefraser.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: AJ Mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 27 August 2007 8:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
Railo Community is free
http://railo.ch/en/index.cfm?treeID=149
On 8/27/07, Dale Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love
.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Dale Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 27 August 2007 8:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Railo 2 Released
Oh,
I just read that, never bothered as I thought Community meant that it would
have
I just read that, never bothered as I thought Community meant that it would
have to be a community ie NON commercial website.
But reading the page, this doesn't seem to be the case.
Correct, it can be used for a small business site, as long as it only uses 1
database, no CFX tags, and no
On 8/26/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall I like the speed of the product, and the price:-)
Yes, Railo has some nice features and is certainly very, very fast. It
does a better job of supporting frameworks than BlueDragon from what I
can tell although, like BlueDragon, it does
The main thing that bugs me is CFX tags they have to be java based not C++.
which rules out a lot of useful CFX tags out there.
Andrew.
~|
Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder,
plug-ins for
Railo released their 2.0 edition today. I've been testing stuff against
the release candidates for a few months now and love it...
http://www.railo.ch/en/index.cfm
~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest
Message-
From: David Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Railo 2 Released
Railo released their 2.0 edition today. I've been testing stuff against
the release candidates for a few months now and love it...
http://www.railo.ch/en/index.cfm
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Railo 2 Released
Railo released their 2.0 edition today. I've been testing stuff against
the release candidates for a few months now and love it...
http://www.railo.ch/en/index.cfm
... the savings might be worth the sacrifice
at that price point.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: AJ Mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Railo 2 Released
I though I recalled seeing (on the old site) something about a limit when
having
48 matches
Mail list logo
