Thanks Byron -- I am going to roll out CF10 on a couple of sites and see how it goes. I can always roll back if I have to.
-- Cheers! Michael David ------ Original Message ------ From: "Byron Mann" <byronos...@gmail.com> To: "cf-talk" <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> Sent: 6/13/2012 1:51:21 AM Subject: Re: CF10 vs CF9 performance >We have our internal cluster running 10. > >We had an issue with consuming some .NET web services that returned complex >objects. Some of the accesor methods used to look like isIsAdmin(), are now >getIsAdmin(). > >We also were using the MS JDBC driver on CF 9.0.1 for DSNs, since we had >issues running on Jetty and using trusted authentication with the baked in >MS SQL driver. > >With CF10 we couldn't get trusted auth working with the MS JDBC driver and >reverted back to the CF10 MS SQL driver without issue. > >Performance wise, we used IIS rewrite rules to offload the Cf requests to >the 9 cluster, we now use the CF10 connectors to a cluster and have noticed >some significant improvements. We haven't done analysis in-depth, so it is >hard to say if this is the connector or actually CF10. I have a feeling it >is 10 more than the connectors, as a lot of the functions consuming web >services seem to act more reliably and faster with axis 2. > >I can say I have had far less service restarts. We used to have many >threads hang with web service calls. Seems like those Soap requests will >actually timeout properly now using axis 2. > >In fact today, I had to replace a jar file on all the instances and noticed >all of them had been up since I manually restarted them about 10 days ago >for something similar. > >I will say enabling execution times for debugging is simply awful, if you >have a lot/of templates processing on a page. The tree view actually runs >better than the standard view now. We were seeing 7+ seconds debug render >times for summary view, as opposed/to 2+ seconds for the tree view, which >still kind of stinks, on some pages in our staging environment. > >Byron Mann >Lead Engineer and Architect >Hostmysite.com >On Jun 11, 2012 12:10 PM, "Michael David" < >li...@michaeldavid.com >> wrote: > > >> >> >>Has anyone seen any performance stats on CF10 vs CF9? >> >>Also, has anyone here put CF10 into production yet? I usually wait for >>a few months to see if any issues arise, but am pondering putting CF10 >>into production on a project that will be launching soon. >>-- >>Cheers! >>Michael David >> >> >> >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:351610 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
