Re: Reactor and transactions

On Thursday 18 May 2006 21:54, Nathan Strutz wrote: > http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor@doughughes.net/msg01241.html Ah ha, great. That's another good solution Dough has picked there - fits well with what we're planning :-) -- Tom Chiverton ***

Re: Reactor and transactions

OK, here's the thread from just last month: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor@doughughes.net/msg01241.html -nathan strutz http://www.dopefly.com/ On 5/18/06, Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From what I remember reading on the Reactor list, there are a few places > where transact

Re: Reactor and transactions

>From what I remember reading on the Reactor list, there are a few places where transactions would be beneficial internally. By default those places include cftransactions, but when you have your own cftransaction tags, it has a boolean argument or property you can set to exclude the internal cftra

Re: Reactor and transactions

I believe you have to handle transactions further up in the application stack (i.e. controller or service layer). You would wrap calls to reactor object with cftransaction. -dante ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cf

Re: Reactor and transactions

I just did a search on some reactor generated files and they do include cftransaction on Insert queries. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:240920 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.c

Reactor and transactions

Does anyone know how well Reactor created active records/gateways play with transactions ? Do the contain transaction tags inside themselves (stopping you from putting cftransaction tags around several updates to different objects) for instance ? CF7 if that helps. -- Tom Chiverton **