Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
What lists are these?
http://webdesign-l.com/ The list owner is Steven Champeon, and let me
give you fair warning - if you wish to join do *NOT* top post on this one!
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d run by Eric Meyer.
Both are most definitely
Henderson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Sep 07 08:22:44 2006
Subject: Re: Replying after the message
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
What lists are these?
http://webdesign-l.com/ The list owner is Steven Champeon, and let me
give you fair warning - if you wish to join do *NOT* top post on this one!
http
this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Henderson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 06 05:06:13 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
I know Thunderbird etc
:13 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
Then Dave Watts responded
No, it's just you
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 06 00:31:29 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
No, it's
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
An RFC for posting, lol.
Looks like I will have to scroll for more, and more, and more:-)
That isn't very convincing from somebody with a 15 line signature.
Jochem
~|
Introducing the
LOL, yeah well corporate rules, and besides the sig is at the end ;-p
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 September 2006 13:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Replying after the message
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
An RFC for posting, lol
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
LOL, yeah well corporate rules
That's why I don't post from a corporate address: I think it is unprofessional
to bombard readers with all that junk. It is a one-time setup issue for me vs.
a recurring reading experience for everybody on the list.
Jochem
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
damn annoying?!
No fingers at anyone just a gripe.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey,
I'm still trying to figure out why gmail puts my signiture at the
bottom of the reply even though I'll br posting above it...
On 9/5/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
No, it's just you.
Here are some relevant links.
The RFC in question (yes, there is one!):
, on the
average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save the most
scrolling time.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:57 PM
Subject: OT: Replying after the message
I
Josh Nathanson wrote:
So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save the
most
scrolling time.
Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has
properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular
question or subject that they are
Josh Nathanson wrote:
So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save
the most
scrolling time.
Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has
properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular
question or subject that they are
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
damn annoying?!
No. ;-)
Personally, I think it *does* make more sense the way we read, to first read
the text that the email is replying to. I
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
Then Dave Watts responded
No, it's just you.
I totally agree with Dave but that is just
16 matches
Mail list logo
