> > Is there any reason the variables need to be in the
> > application scope to begin with? Seems like it would be
> > simpler just to set them in the request scope from the
> > get-go...
>
> not really, was just looking at tweaking little bits of this
> application i am having to work on
oi Ubqtous!!
Thursday, January 29, 2004, 12:46:48 PM, you wrote:
U> Is there any reason the variables need to be in the application scope
U> to begin with? Seems like it would be simpler just to set them in the
U> request scope from the get-go...
not really, was just looking at tweaking little
Critter,
On 1/29/2004 at 12:32, you wrote:
C> but if i duplicate the application scope into the request
C> scope for each page hit... am i using more memory ?
Is there any reason the variables need to be in the application scope
to begin with? Seems like it would be simpler just to set th
equest scope why put them in
the Application scope at all? Just create them for each request where
you're doing the copying now, I would think.
Jim Davis
_
From: Critter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Request/applicatio
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Critter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 9:33 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Request/application scope question
>
> oi CF-Talk,!!
>
> i'm sure this has been asked many times in t
oi CF-Talk,!!
i'm sure this has been asked many times in the past... i just cannot remember the answer...
using CFMX.
lets say i have four variables that do not change at all.
i can place them in the application scope and it takes up the memory space for 4 variables, no?
but if i d
6 matches
Mail list logo
