> > Some of my frustrations with MySQL are:
> > - Only 1 query per
>
> I happen to think that is a good thing :)
Sorry, I have to jump in here. I agree with this, it is a good thing.
They don't allow multiple queries because to do so is a security risk.
But I always laugh because whenever I bri
> Some of my frustrations with MySQL are:
> - Only 1 query per
MySQL can handle multiple queries, it's just disabled by default. Cameron
Childress has a post about this.
MySQL: How to Combine Multiple SQL Statements in One CFQUERY
http://www.sumoc.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=7F6F7314-50
Matthew Chambers wrote:
>
> Some of my frustrations with MySQL are:
> - Only 1 query per
I happen to think that is a good thing :)
> - Unable to handle complex join queries e.g. I ran a complex query in
> a trail version of SQL Server 2000 and it returned in 3 seconds, it
> took 33 mins in M
To cut your cost for SQL Server find an SPLA partner and pay $10 month
instead.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2006 23:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Server 2005 vs MySQL 5?
Hi,
I've been working on a website built using
Hi,
I've been working on a website built using MySQL and have been frustraited by
it on numerious occasions over the past 8 months. Admittedly we are running
v4.1 however because I've got much more experience with SQL Server (and from
what I've read it is the better choice) I'm looking for some
5 matches
Mail list logo
