RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Burns, John D
Ahhh, see I know someone would come along with a better answer than mine! Good call! John -Original Message- From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) Just go to

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Barney Boisvert
gt; Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:11 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) > > Well I did some testing and CF handled gigantor strings (20 > million characters and more) without fail, even via form > posts. but the sql insert

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Tom Kitta
 John   -Original Message-   From: Brendan Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:11 PM   To: CF-Talk   Subject: Re: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)   Well I did some testing and CF handled gigantor strings (20 million   characters and more) wi

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Burns, John D
ssage- From: Brendan Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) Well I did some testing and CF handled gigantor strings (20 million characters and more) without fail, even via form posts. but th

Re: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Brendan Baldwin
tes by default? Could this be your issue? > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Dudley >Sent: 07 April 2004 17:02 >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) > > >I suppose another possible culprit would be the datasource, have you

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Craig Dudley
Ah, after Dave said 65k, made me think, isn't the datasource long text buffer size 65000 bytes by default? Could this be your issue? -Original Message- From: Craig Dudley Sent: 07 April 2004 17:02 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) I suppose an

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Craig Dudley
I suppose another possible culprit would be the datasource, have you enabled clobs? just a thought. -Original Message- From: Brendan Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 16:57 To: CF-Talk Subject: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question) Does CF have a hard-limit

RE: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Dave Watts
> Does CF have a hard-limit on number of characters for string > variables? I would guess that CFMX has the same limitations that Java has, with regard to underlying datatypes. Unfortunately, being a lousy Java programmer, I'm not aware of what those are. > Do form posts from textareas themselve

Re: String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 07 Apr 2004 16:56 pm, Brendan Baldwin wrote: > Does CF have a hard-limit on number of characters for string variables?  Do > form posts from textareas themselves have a hard-limit?  We have a database I think most browsers will refuse to send back more than about 2K of form data. --

String Length Hard-Limit (NOT a RegEx question)

2004-04-07 Thread Brendan Baldwin
Does CF have a hard-limit on number of characters for string variables?  Do form posts from textareas themselves have a hard-limit?  We have a database column of type nText which is truncating well before the (2^30)-1 character limit and I suspect an internal CF limit may be the culprit. Thanks!