Re: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-04-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 30 Mar 2007, Rick Root wrote: > I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a > variety of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically > selected in a certain list control. OOI, why not use SharedObject() ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to enormousl

Re: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-03-30 Thread Rick Root
I still use WDDX in old and new applications. Not often, but I find it valuable for storing data in the database that I don't need to be searchable. I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a variety of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically selec

Re: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-03-30 Thread Dan O'Keefe
Thanks Jim, this is very helpful. Dan On 3/23/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: WDDX v.s. C

RE: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-03-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality > > While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was > wondering if >

RE: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-03-23 Thread Tero Pikala
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 March 2007 11:54 To: CF-Talk Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was wondering if WDDX still has value that is not currently offered in the XML support of CF 7.02. Seems like opedwddx.org is pretty stale. An

WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality

2007-03-23 Thread Dan O'Keefe
While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was wondering if WDDX still has value that is not currently offered in the XML support of CF 7.02. Seems like opedwddx.org is pretty stale. Any thoughts? Thanks, Dan -- Dan O'Keefe ~