Cfimage has performance issues and tends to break down under load esp on
shared servers. So even if you are not putting it under load, is anyone
else?
I don't think we have had any issues from customers using cfx_image
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
cfmldeveloper.com
cflive.net
cfsearch.com
I have also seen random issues with CFimage in 8 and 9, where it will not
load an image due to image format. Things like the color map used for a
jpg. Cfx_image seems to be able to handle most conversions more gracefully.
Byron Mann
Lead Engineer Architect
HostMySite.com
On May 19, 2014 11:42
Rather than having the site owner have to create thumbnails for each product, I
was planning on having cfimage resize the images as needed. I am having a
security issue that support is working on with me. The cfimage only needs to
run once so performance is not a huge issue. Looking through
My company has a dynamic codebase which programmatically creates 2000+
applications (one for each site we host). Everything unique to a site is
stored in either the app scope, or session scope (for each user). I've
tossed out the concept of changing our codebase to have just ONE application
(per
On Dec 31, 2007 8:01 AM, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if anyone knows what the differences might be in performance vs
each of these methods. I sort of suspect that our current method has more
overhead than the proposed method but I'm not sure how to prove it, or to
test it.
Quick question...
I'm wanting to do a keyword search would be it best to
A. have one huge text field (varchar2 or clob) and search using like '%keyword%'
or
B. set up the database where these search-a-ble words are each a row
themselves.. with an ID.
So you'd have 50+ fields with each searchable
The latter will almost certainly be faster, probably by a large
margin. However, the former will be far simpler to set up and
maintain. How about option C, create a full text index on your CLOB
from option A, and use that? I know SQL Server and MySQL both support
such indexes, I'd imagine
one word...Verity :)
DK
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:38 -0600, Greg Morphis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question...
I'm wanting to do a keyword search would be it best to
A. have one huge text field (varchar2 or clob) and search using like
'%keyword%'
or
B. set up the database where
Cool, this was more or less just a preformance (which would you do in
this situation) question.
Thanks for the responses :)
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:09:26 -0500, Douglas Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one word...Verity :)
DK
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:38 -0600, Greg Morphis [EMAIL
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2001 3:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Which is better?
why not just run a query on that page?
Every time your application has to retrieve data from an external
datasource, be it a SQL database or page fetched with CFHTTP, you increase
the page execution time
Which is better in this situation: using application variables or cfcache?
I have an application variable from a query which populates a select box.
Would it be better to use cfcache instead?
Sebastian
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code
why not just run a query on that page?
- Original Message -
From: sebastian palmigiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: Which is better?
Which is better in this situation: using application variables or cfcache?
I
Which is better in this situation: using application variables or cfcache?
I like to use CFCACHE because it obviates the need to lock access to
Application variables. However, there are some times where you will want to
have more control over when or with what frequency a cached query
why not just run a query on that page?
Every time your application has to retrieve data from an external
datasource, be it a SQL database or page fetched with CFHTTP, you increase
the page execution time dramatically and increase your reliance on external
devices such as the network, the server
I am redesigning a tv station website and I have weather and stock info that is
captured from our news system and stuck in a database. The current system is when a
user hits the website a query is executed to get the data with a 10 minute
cachedwithin setting. The new system is was think
I'm not following your application that well, so take my comments with a
grain of salt.
I started out to use an application-scoped structure to put my database in
RAM, but abandoned it because cached queries were faster and simpler.
However, this was probably because I simply put the database
I am looking to invest some money in some computers soon and was
wondering which is a better configuration. 2 huge computers with maxed out
ram, raid 5, 3 network cards, the whole nine yards, or that equivalent price
with maybe 5 computers and everything is clustered using cluster cats
What you have defined suggests session variables.
One good way to determine which scope to use is to consider:
how long the variables should remain (make sense) in the system
what is the broadest level to which they apply (will every visitor
see the same value or will each have an
Thank you very much. That was a great explanation of each! Have a great
day!
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Which is better??
What you have defined suggests session
Ok, lets say that I create an application called BillsApp.
Now I need to store some variables being carried forward from some forms
before we actually insert them into the db.
Should I create session variables from the form input CFSET
session.variable = "#form.whatever#", or should I create a
20 matches
Mail list logo
