Re: anti-cfflush

2003-02-25 Thread mark brinkworth
Mostly it is documented in the JSP specs, which is possibly why MM didn't go overboard on documenting the function. It provides a number of convenience function to get references to various objects (such as the Request object, the Response object, and in the case of this code, getOut returns a refe

RE: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Andre Mohamed
More specifically, see here: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/jsp/PageCont ext.html Thanks, André -Original Message- From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 February 2003 15:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: anti-cfflush > i suppose i should k

RE: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Andre Mohamed
15:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: anti-cfflush > i suppose i should know this but what else is hungoff of getPageContext()? its kind of lacking in terms of docs. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?foru

Re: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Hastings
> i suppose i should know this but what else is hungoff of getPageContext()? its kind of lacking in terms of docs. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.co

Re: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread mark brinkworth
Dang, forgot about that way > > > > Jochem __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com ~| A

RE: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Hugo Ahlenius
Thanks, I knew it wouldn't be too hard! This way I can ensure that the XML declaration (for XHTML pages) gets on top, without having to worry about white-spaces before! ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index

Re: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Hugo Ahlenius wrote: > > I thought it would be natural to have a tag that just deletes the current > rendered page from memory, and starts off again. Kind of like cfflush, > which flushes the page to the client, but instead flushes it from memory. Jochem ~~~

Re: anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread mark brinkworth
In CFMX you could do this Cheers, Mark --- Hugo Ahlenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something... ? If I may, please direct > me to where I can do > my homework... > > I thought it would be natural to have a tag that > just deletes the current > rendered page from mem

anti-cfflush

2003-02-24 Thread Hugo Ahlenius
Hi, Am I missing something... ? If I may, please direct me to where I can do my homework... I thought it would be natural to have a tag that just deletes the current rendered page from memory, and starts off again. Kind of like cfflush, which flushes the page to the client, but instead flushes it