Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-07-07 Thread paul smith
And the better replacement for CFPARAM is? best, paul At 10:14 AM 7/6/00 -0400, you wrote: In the case of the term being discussed, a better replacement has been provided. -- Archives:

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-07-06 Thread Jeff Davis
-= Albert Einstein __ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 18:16:02 -0700 From: "Computer Simplistics Suppoer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cfparam depreciated? Message-ID: 000f01bfb241$a67c5e10$[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someo

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-30 Thread Larry W. Virden
From: "Computer Simplistics Suppoer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone explain the term "deprecated". I see it come up in Studio every once in a while and I am guessing that it means the function I am using is no longer in use, but what is the technical explanation of it? Basically, it is a

cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Brian Mitter
Hi all, I've heard that cfparm has been deprciated and that IsDefined should be used instead. Is this correct? Can anyone clarify things for me please? Thanks -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Josh Black
The ParameterExists function has been deprecated by IsDefined, not cfparam. HTH Josh Black - Original Message - From: "Brian Mitter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 5:33 PM Subject: cfparam depreciated? Hi all, I've heard that

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread LetchfordDesign
This is off the top of my head, so I may be wrong, but I believe the one that is on its way out is ParameterExists, not cfparam. Hi all, I've heard that cfparm has been deprciated and that IsDefined should be used instead. Is this correct? Can anyone clarify things for me please?

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Computer Simplistics Suppoer
a Complex World" http://www.c-s.net 661-296-4315 - Original Message - From: "Brian Mitter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 5:33 PM Subject: cfparam depreciated? Hi all, I've heard that cfparm has been deprciated and that IsD

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Brian Mitter
doh!...of course, must have got mixed up somewhere... thanks :) - Original Message - From: "Josh Black" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 1:38 AM Subject: Re: cfparam depreciated? The ParameterExists function has been deprecated by

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Fred T. Sanders
resumably happily working) code depend on the feature(s) that have passed out of favor. See also {dusty deck}. " - Original Message - From: "Computer Simplistics Suppoer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 8:16 PM Subject: Re: cfparam depre

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Computer Simplistics Suppoer
- From: "Fred T. Sanders" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 6:20 PM Subject: Re: cfparam depreciated? the phrases: "old", "worn out" "used up" "a throw away" come to mind when I think of possible de

Re: cfparam depreciated?

2000-04-29 Thread Computer Simplistics Suppoer
2000 6:33 PM Subject: Re: cfparam depreciated? *sigh* they are commands that will likely work for many years to come, but no guarantees. (take the font tag for example it has been deprecated with the preferred method being style sheets and classes. HTML is being deprecated and XML will