ok thanks tom will def do this
thanks again for your help
> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Richard White wrote:
> > i need it to validate the value based on the criteria:
>
> Err, right, so just return the result of rematch() ? You don't need
> the actual
> value itself.
> Get a good regular expressi
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Richard White wrote:
> i need it to validate the value based on the criteria:
Err, right, so just return the result of rematch() ? You don't need the actual
value itself.
Get a good regular expression editor - there are several online ones and I
hear someone compiled kreg
> You mean once you've determined it's a valid string, you then want
> that string
> as a number ?
> CF is typeless, so just use it as is.
no, i mean i need to validate that the the value i pass in to that function is
a valid float. e.g. 10.00 would pass but a2.00 would not pass:
i need it to
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Richard White wrote:
> so i have changed it to the following but now it is throwing passing back a
> value of 1, on the following regalar expression:
> "^[\+|-]?[0-9][0-9]*(\.[0-9][0-9]*)$"
You mean once you've determined it's a valid string, you then want that string
as a
hi tom, i thought i needed to use the negative look ahead as otherwise it will
pick up the first part that it does match but i want it to go through my entire
value checking all values to see if they match, is this why it is getting stuck
on 1?
thanks
> hi tom, yes thanks i didn't realise that
hi tom, yes thanks i didn't realise that!!! that is making it too complicated!
so i have changed it to the following but now it is throwing passing back a
value of 1, on the following regalar expression:
"^[\+|-]?[0-9][0-9]*(\.[0-9][0-9]*)$"
for the value 10.00
do you have any idea why it is d
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Richard White wrote:
> i have used negative lookahead
This makes things very complicated.
> isnt part of the regular expression, and therefore have the following code
> to test for an error:
Why not use a simpler reg exp with out the look ahead (such as /[+-]?[0-9]
[0-9]
hi
i am trying to create my own isValidFloat function using a regalar expression
but it isnt behaving how i would like and cannot work out what the problem is:
this is my float regaular expression
i have used negative lookahead so that it will return me any point that isnt
part of the regula
8 matches
Mail list logo
