Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Jochem van Dieten
jon hall wrote: > Ahah! Now to figure out the mechanism Create a subdirectory under /cfide/administrator and don't put in an Application.cfm. Not recommended for production use :-) Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffus

Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Josh Trefethen wrote: > Yep, I can access it with Updater 2. Any chance you can send me (offlist) a dump of the SecurityService from your CF MX install? I am seeing several entries on a machine with Updater 3 it that I don't remember from when I worked with it before, and which appear to contr

Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread jon hall
Ahah! Now to figure out the mechanism Thanks -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 12:00:57 PM, you wrote: JvD> jon hall wrote: >> Is there a way to shut off the new restrictions, or perhaps work >> around it? JvD> It will work if you are logged in to the CF Administrat

getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread yakov tetelbaum
I tried to submit form in pdf file and send to coldfusion server. It is possible to make HTML and all fields are transmitting in cfm file, but when I try fdf, pdf, or xml it is not transmitting. May be I should use special variables in cfm file Thank you in advance Yakov Tetelbaum ~

RE: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
, May 28, 2003 12:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: getRunTime() This app will be on a non-shared system. I thought that cfexecute would finish executing before allowing the cffile to start? If so, that would defeat my purpose. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 11:55:57 AM

Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread jon hall
27;t you use cfexecute? It can either BFH> write the output to the a file. Then read the file and step through it with BFH> cfflush. BFH> -Original Message- BFH> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BFH> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:54 AM BFH> To: CF-Talk BFH> Su

Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Jochem van Dieten
jon hall wrote: > Is there a way to shut off the new restrictions, or perhaps work > around it? It will work if you are logged in to the CF Administrator. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?foru

RE: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
t: Re: getRunTime() Is there a way to shut off the new restrictions, or perhaps work around it? The whole point of this is to get access to and flush the output of a shell from something other than the log file. So I am pretty sure I need to do this within CF because I need the cfflush tag. -- jon m

RE: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Josh Trefethen
8, 2003 8:37 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: getRunTime() > > > I think this is due to updater 3. Because of the past ability > to get the security service. It looks like they shut off > access to the runtime service also. > > -Original Message- > From: jo

Re: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread jon hall
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BFH> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:39 AM BFH> To: CF-Talk BFH> Subject: getRunTime() BFH> This code is bombing on me on the last line below. CF errors out with BFH> no actual error message. Everything is fine up to the point I try and BFH> get t

RE: getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
I think this is due to updater 3. Because of the past ability to get the security service. It looks like they shut off access to the runtime service also. -Original Message- From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: getRunTime

getRunTime()

2003-05-29 Thread jon hall
This code is bombing on me on the last line below. CF errors out with no actual error message. Everything is fine up to the point I try and get the output stream. The methods are correctly being executed and doing what they are supposed to do... Stack trace starts like this: java.lang.IllegalAcces