Re: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Pete Ruckelshaus
CF_Anywhere was pretty cool, I regret not being able to play with it more when it was available in JRun. Pete - Original Message - From: "Pete Freitag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: RE

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 03:10 PM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: >I don't think TagServlet has been out for 3 years, I think it just came out >last year. You are probably thinking of CF_Anywhere which was made by Live >Software (who made JRun, and was bought by Allaire). CF_Anywhere was >probably where the idea for Neo

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jacob
> >NDA exists to protect the developer and the company... you wouldn't like >it if someone called your bank and asked the bank freely gave away your >credit history, details or if someone visited your doctor and he gave >sensitive CONFIDENTIAL information to that visitor would you? You can now i

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Pete Freitag
from. + Pete Freitag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) CTO, CFDEV.COM ColdFusion Developer Resources http://www.cfdev.com/ -Original Message- From: VAN VLIET, SCOTT E (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Well, I ha

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread VAN VLIET, SCOTT E (SBCSI)
://www.sbc.com| +--+---+ -Original Message- From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question "It is not about who or what someone can do re: CF > J2EE convertor (which seems a lit

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Haggerty, Michael A.
ril 18, 2002 12:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Actually, the people who are mentioning the NDA when MX comes up are protecting me and the lists as much as they are enforcing the NDA. If MX is discussed openly here in violation of the NDA then MM could get upset with me personally

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
runner'esque. We're all looking forward to putting your hard work to good use! :) Adam. > -Original Message- > From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:27 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: neo question > > > Sor

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Michael Dinowitz
ant > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:01 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: neo question >> >> >> weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Neil Clark - =TMM=
Sorry you take offence Adam :( But it does help if everyone would honour the NDA - unfortunately its not the case and leaks do get out!, when people 'rant' about NDA it is merely to protect the interests of both MACR and the developers who use the products. Also when people post about "itÂ’s a br

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
hehe, I stand corrected. > -Original Message- > From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:56 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: neo question > > > At 09:45 AM 4/18/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Yes, for the love of god,

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 09:45 AM 4/18/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo. It's not >that your questions bother me, it just these pissy little NDA police getting >their panties all in a bunch. I swear, I think some of these people do >nothing BUT search for neo que

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Allan Pichler
I second that --Allan -Original Message- From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Yes, for the love of god, PLEASE stop posting questions about neo. It's not that your questions bother me, it

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Cantrell, Adam
- let them take care of it. EORant > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:01 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: neo question > > > weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on > m

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Tony_Petruzzi
m: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: neo question Um - you _do_ know that this isn't the proper place to talk about Neo? Haven't we been over this already? -sigh- Please post your question to the Neo beta forums. Any

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Christine Lawson
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: neo question weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on my xp pro box and the installation did go fine. the thing is that after the install, i tried to access the cf administrator backend and

Re: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on my xp pro box > and the installation did go fine. the thing is that after the install, i > tried to access the cf administrator backend and the cfide directory is not > in my wwwroot directory. i did a search

RE: neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Raymond Camden
; -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:01 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: neo question > > > weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on > my xp pro box > and the installation did

neo question

2002-04-18 Thread Tony_Petruzzi
weird thing just happened. i tried to install the neo beta on my xp pro box and the installation did go fine. the thing is that after the install, i tried to access the cf administrator backend and the cfide directory is not in my wwwroot directory. i did a search on my drive and the cfide directo