I understand that in CF5 there's a decent speed difference between using
locked session variables and request variables. Now that CF takes care of
locking of session variables, is there still enough performance difference
to warrant copying the session variables to the request scope if I'm going
: -Original Message-
: From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:05 AM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: session vs. request scope speed in MX
:
:
: I understand that in CF5 there's a decent speed difference between using
: locked session variables and request
hi,
I am trying to decide the best way to deploy an application..
background:
multi-language site. Page content pulled from database. I originally had
all static text (such as headings) wrapped in a cfif tag. This got really
hard to deal with, and wasnt very clean code.
solution:
at the
multi-language site. Page content pulled from database. I originally had
all static text (such as headings) wrapped in a cfif tag. This got
really
hard to deal with, and wasnt very clean code.
why not initialize everything (all pages, all languages) into structure(s)
based on language
]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: session vs request
hi,
I am trying to decide the best way to deploy an application..
background:
multi-language site. Page content pulled from database. I originally had
all static text (such as headings) wrapped in a cfif tag. This got
]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: session vs request
hi,
I am trying to decide the best way to deploy an application..
background:
multi-language site. Page content pulled from database. I originally ha
d
all static text (such as headings) wrapped in a cfif tag
6 matches
Mail list logo