[cfaussie] Re: Form building/validating cf tools

2006-12-14 Thread Charlie Arehart
For those folks, point them to Dreamweaver's ability to do so (as well as to build SQL queries, build CFCs, build calls to them and web services, and more). Yes, yes, many CF folks will raise all manner of complaints against Dreamweaver. That's not the point here. You've got "vb type" developers

[cfaussie] Re: Form building/validating cf tools

2006-12-14 Thread Charlie Arehart
Thanks, Mike, but in case anyone has tried to "just drop" that XML CFFORM example into a CFML page, you'll have found that the references to personbean and qstates make it fail. :-) To save the trouble for all you good chooks just getting to work in OZ, here's a version that does work (creates a

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Joel Cass
Hmm. I remember when I first came to Sydney I went on a 4WD trip with a project manager for the Vodafone AU website. I remember having quite a fueled argument about CF vs ASP.. Back then most of their site was in ASP. Hmm. How things change. Eh, we didn't get along. I had to get a ride back home

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Toby Tremayne
And for anyone else up at this time of night or tomorrow morning without sufficient caffeine, that was a joke :p On 15/12/2006, at 0:45 , Toby Tremayne wrote: > > Besides, I'm sure those scummy ms-fanboy ASP programmers aren't all > up still working and reading work related mailing lists at th

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Toby Tremayne
Besides, I'm sure those scummy ms-fanboy ASP programmers aren't all up still working and reading work related mailing lists at this time of the night... :) Toby On 15/12/2006, at 0:42 , Barry Beattie wrote: > > I'll happily > concede that their are arguments and business cases for many, man

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Barry Beattie
I'll happily concede that their are arguments and business cases for many, many options of which PHP and CF are just two "Everyone's a winner, babe, that's the trooth..." Hey Matt, y'kno what I'd like to see? that story make it into the IT section of the Tuesdays Australian. Business section.

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Tom Kerr
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:18:09AM +1100, Dale Fraser wrote: > Coldfusion is old compared to PHP, about to release 8 PHP is 5.2. I promised myself I wouldn't be drawn into this conversation again, but I can't let this slip by, mostly because it reminds me somewhat of this daily WTF: http://thedai

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread M@ Bourke
On 12/14/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > well, they've obviously got a business reason to use ColdFusion > > Yup they swear by its speed of development. the aussie shop is also CF I guess they have some smart people. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Yo

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread Barry Beattie
well, they've obviously got a business reason to use ColdFusion On 12/14/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://vodafone.co.uk > has just relaunched there shops in cf 7.02 and fusebox5.0 > and they aint a small company, > market value on last check was around $130 Billion USD > >

[cfaussie] Re: Form building/validating cf tools

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Kear
No. all you do is just use CF tags instead of the regular html tags. ColdFusion does all the xml for you. In fact, you could easily use them throughout your site wthout ever knowing what XML is or touching it at all. Here's what a simple XML form looks like: Put that into a CFM page

[cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion Is Old Hat compared to php aps etc !!!!

2006-12-14 Thread M@ Bourke
http://vodafone.co.uk has just relaunched there shops in cf 7.02 and fusebox5.0 and they aint a small company, market value on last check was around $130 Billion USD M@ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group