now replying to the whole group
From: Jorke Odolphi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 20 October 2007 12:33 AM
To: Scott Barnes; cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [cfaussie] Re: MSSQL 2005 Developer Edition
So I actually agree with Mike, DTS rocked and it just plain worked,
no
oh and he can code in Coldfusion and is Brisbane based! :P
On 10/19/07, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you guys owe me ;) so next time i get punchy with Adobe or something like
> that and you decide to tear me a new one, think of this moment in time.
>
> I manage to hunt my way throu
you guys owe me ;) so next time i get punchy with Adobe or something like
that and you decide to tear me a new one, think of this moment in time.
I manage to hunt my way through the org charts here at Microsoft and find
someone in the SQL team whom i can bend their ear on a feature that doesn't
ge
it should sit there and wait for the lock (stand in a que waiting it's
turn) until timeout ("I'm sick of this, I'm outta here")
I wonder if CFThread is of any use here? join an execute the extra
code when the other process has finished?
On 10/19/07, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
Not sure would it? I guess that's what im asking.
If I do a named lock of that sort.
Then what happens if the next user gets to that code, does it sit and wait
for the lock or error.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://learncf.com
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
