Its just strange because i do see noticible speed differences between
homesite and eclipse
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Monday, 13 October 2008 4:33 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: C
> Is it just me or is RDS on CFCLIPSE as slow as bananas rolling down a hill?
Hehe. that's funny. I'm gonna chuckle on that mental image all afternoon.
Steve, I've had issues with it too, but I blame it on a slow network
and it's need to authenticate any movement of files. Dreamewaver and
RDS ha
Is it just me or is RDS on CFCLIPSE as slow as bananas rolling down a hill?
Figured it was time to move to eclipse as i have flex builder so i am using
the cfeclpse plugin for that and its just nuts. Homesite RDS is twice as
fast and will connect to all CF servers were as i am having issues with
There is one called Cartweaver
http://www.cartweaver.com/
I used an earlier version and found it was OK but lacking some flexibility,
especially with product categories. The latest version may have improved
though. It was easy enough to integrate into sites.
Cassie
-Original Message--
Hi folks,
Does anyone have any recommendations for a ColdFusion based open-
source shopping cart? It doesn't have to be free, just fully
customisable. It would be good if it supported loyalty programs and
promotional codes as well.
I've tried CF-EZcart before. It's ok, but I'd like to know what
If you pay taxes... You are paying at least some of it.
We are all paying for it.
/OT BS
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Scott Thornton <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SQL server licences cost me nothing. Government contract :>
>
> >>> "Steve Onnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 13/10/2008 11:41 am >>>
SQL server licences cost me nothing. Government contract :>
>>> "Steve Onnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 13/10/2008 11:41 am >>>
"just need someone to pay for CF licences"
Ill pay for your cf licenses if you pay for my sql licenses:)
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:
"just need someone to pay for CF licences"
Ill pay for your cf licenses if you pay for my sql licenses:)
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Thornton
Sent: Monday, 13 October 2008 11:24 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject:
HI,
Its always worth it ( imho ).
A year or more ago we went from an aging dual-core machine as our SQL server to
a dual quad-core SQL 2005 64bit cluster. Its reliable and blindingly fast. I
recall a certain report that took 15 minutes reduce to about 30 seconds. Having
32gig ram per server h
> A simple cost effective solution may be log shipping.. if you have another
> server handy. That may mean you have to point your DSN to the different
> server if things go pear-shaped.
anyone know what the licensing implications are for SQLServer to
"hot-swap" like that? Whenever we've needed
Hi,
Typically the install configuration would have your CF server and your Db
server separate anyways.
I think from memory you will find that SQL server will write to your log first,
and then to the physical database table. So don't forget to place your log on a
fast disk\network as well.
Th
@Scott Thornton
"Also clustering sql server for the ultimate in redundancy."
if someone was after hot-swapping from a primary to a back-up machine,
would clustering those two (and ensuring neither hits over 50% use)
get the same thing? (ie: is it worth it just for two?)
(this is putting aside t
My network is gigabit so i am hoping it wont be too bad. The database
server is currently on a different system to the web server anyway. What i
am wanting to know is if the data is written to the MDF file as quickly as
it would if it was on the same physical system as the sql server itself, or
i
What are you meaning by redundant SQL servers?
In my opinion the answer would be delayed, if you are wanting to keep
connectivity in case of an emergency. Clustering, replication are some other
options.
Anything else on my part would be a guess.
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
HI,
There will be an inherent delay in DB access across a network. It will only be
as fast as the slowest piece of your network.
That's why we put our DB databases on disks in a SAN, all connected up with
gigabit ethernet. Pretty much next to the database server in a rack.
What do you mean re
Hey guys
Just curioud to know if anyone knows if there is a delay between data being
written to an MSSQL data file or if it is immediate. I am looking at
storing the SQL data files across a network on a file server and just
wanting to try and find out any issues this would cause if something was
16 matches
Mail list logo
