So,
Anyone here planning on going to any of the pre-conference workshops?
I'm still trying to get the powers to be - to agree to send me to
Charlie's CF Server admin workshop.
While most of charlie's information is available on his website and on
the mailing lists he loiters upon there's
and to back you up in what you say, Gavin, a classic case is formal
study. When I was teaching, I tried to impress on the students, that
although all the info was - in theory - out there ready to tap into,
what was lost was structure and context. Sometimes it needed the
expert to deliver it in a
I have booked Charlie's one. I want to learn that topic in kinda structured way.
- Terry
On 4 August 2010 18:19, Barry Beattie barry.beat...@gmail.com wrote:
and to back you up in what you say, Gavin, a classic case is formal
study. When I was teaching, I tried to impress on the students, that
On 04/08/2010, at 6:19 PM, Barry Beattie wrote:
and to back you up in what you say, Gavin, a classic case is formal
study. When I was teaching, I tried to impress on the students, that
although all the info was - in theory - out there ready to tap into,
what was lost was structure and
On 04/08/2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Onnis wrote:
that's like saying that the manufacturer of a rivet gun should determine
airworthiness standards for aircraft assembled with their products.
Fair call but the manufacturer of a rivet gun should give the user of said
rivet gun guidelines on how
I have to disagree on that one Robin :) I personally think Adobe
pushed cairngorm because it was the only available framework at the
time, and it died because it's over complicated and doesn't really
play to Flex's strengths. Frameworks like Mate etc that use an event
bus and cater for
On 04/08/2010, at 8:09 PM, Toby Tremayne wrote:
I have to disagree on that one Robin :)
Well probably no point getting into a debate about Cairngorm on cfaussie - I'll
be at the Flex UG tomorrow night anyway (at a Mate presentation no less) if
anyone's interested in talking about Flex
Thanks for the support, guys. I look forward to trying to meet your
expectations! :-)
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of
Terry Sasaki
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:33 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
I need to prevent people uploading an access database for a few minutes at a
time, and I want to know if locking it while using it as a DSN will do that.
And it has to happen without human intervention. Here's my scenario ...
I have users uploading an access database from legacy systems,
That story really made my day :)
Mark Drew
Railo Technologies UK
Professional Open Source
skype: mark_railo
email: m...@getrailo.com
gtalk: m...@getrailo.com
tel:+44 7971 85 22 96
web:http://www.getrailo.com
On 4 Aug 2010, at 09:19, Barry Beattie wrote:
I heard a story of
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 08:50, Mike Kear afpwebwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my issue ... how to make sure that while I'm processing the updates,
and preparing the package for download no one can upload a new access
database that will be over-written when I complete my processing.
Move the
11 matches
Mail list logo
