Yeah, but its just another cfcomponent...
B)
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Barry Beattie wrote:
> > At least now I know a lot more about POI than I did before...
>
>
> enough for a quick CFUG presentation?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "
> At least now I know a lot more about POI than I did before...
enough for a quick CFUG presentation?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
I can't quote the forum that I read it on but yes, the problem has been
mentioned and was what got me thinking that it was the file that was at
fault. Someone said that an excel file they were trying to read was failing
but after removing a couple of lines that it could be read without issue.
I do
" It seems to me that something isn't quite right with the POI library"
Ewww...
is there any mention anywhere (Java/POI forums) of this? If you're
quite right, it could either be a bug or incompatibility in the POI
library...
... or Excel and Open Office are a lot more forgiving with sloppy
form
Thanks to everyone who chipped in on this so I thought I would provide a bit of
am update...
In the end... It was the file itself! It is a dynamically generated excel file
so I am unsure of what kind of 'standard' it might be. It can be opened by both
excel and Open Office so it would appear t
I have successfully used cfHSSF - http://cfhssf.riaforge.org/ - on CF8
and am still using it on CF9 (haven't tried cfspreadsheet because
cfHSSF is still doing what I need).
I did have to hack it a bit to get it working. If you would like me
to send you my version of the CFC let me know.
Andy.
O
Brett,
At work we use jXLS a small and easy-to-use Java library for writing
Excel files using XLS templates and reading data from Excel into Java
objects using XML configuration. http://jxls.sourceforge.net/
Hope it helps.
Pragnesh
On Jul 27, 3:29 am, "Brett Payne-Rhodes" wrote:
> Thanks Zac,
