https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
Consider adding a note to clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst. With a few nits this
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75364
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown
-fvisibility=hidden -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s -DLINKAGE=dso_local
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown
-fvisibility=default -fvisibility-global-new-delete=force-hid
jplehr wrote:
I just realized that I need to update the clang lit tests, so this is *not
ready to land*, but I don't see a button to indicate that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78801
`TreeTransform::TransformLambdaExpr` has an outlier case in
`TransformLambdaExpr`. The `TransformFunctionProtoType` call cannot use the
`getDerived()` version because of some reasons I still don't fully u
zygoloid wrote:
> Perhaps we need clarification on what GCC means by "may point to multiple
> objects" in this instance. To me that means either "get me the size of the
> largest of these multiple objects" or "size of the smallest." In my eyes,
> that means pointing to a union field.
Per @nik
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yuxuan Chen (yuxuanchen1997)
Changes
`TreeTransform::TransformLambdaExpr` has an outlier case in
`TransformLambdaExpr`. The `TransformFunctionProtoType` call cannot use the
`getDerived()` version because of some reasons I still don't full
jwakely wrote:
> Also, @jwakely it would be nice if this worked with libstdc++ as well in the
> future -- it would probably turn on checks like `__GLIBCXX_ASSERT__`.
That should be `_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS`
No other thoughts for now. GCC has `-fhardened` now, which already defines that
macro. Th
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78803
This workaround existed due to https://gcc.gnu.org/PR56135. The website says
that the bug was fixed in GCC 4.8.0 and the latest host toolchain requirement
says GCC 7.4. I think it would be very safe to dr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yuxuan Chen (yuxuanchen1997)
Changes
This workaround existed due to https://gcc.gnu.org/PR56135. The website says
that the bug was fixed in GCC 4.8.0 and the latest host toolchain requirement
says GCC 7.4. I think it would be very safe to
bwendling wrote:
> > Perhaps we need clarification on what GCC means by "may point to multiple
> > objects" in this instance. To me that means either "get me the size of the
> > largest of these multiple objects" or "size of the smallest." In my eyes,
> > that means pointing to a union field.
isuckatcs wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69971
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
isuckatcs wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70053
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78763
>From 0d68286bd8b7206c5045062f65ccaf1c3fb54714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:20:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add option -fstdlib-hardening=
The option allows users to
https://github.com/ahatanak edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/5chmidti requested changes to this pull request.
Sorry for making this so iterative ^^ but I think that after these everything
is good from my side.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-use-std-min-max
+
+readability-use-std-min-max
+===
+
+Replaces certain conditionals with ``std::min`` or ``std::max`` for
readability,
+promoting use of standard library functions. Note: This may impac
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77393
>From 93ab63157297553fa678752995773db8b14642fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:22:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?UTF-
@@ -4557,7 +4561,13 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
return;
Value *SizeVal =
IRB.CreateTypeSize(MS.IntptrTy, DL.getTypeStoreSize(ElemTy));
-IRB.CreateCall(MS.MsanInstrumentAsmStoreFn, {Operand, SizeVal});
+if (MS.CompileKernel) {
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77393
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
I suspect asan may complain on new/free mismatch
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
None
>From b2c13350471c50f75d7a32d118faf7b04a5fbede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:07:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/unittests/Interpreter/InterpreterTest.cpp (+3-8)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/unittests/I
https://github.com/evodius96 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78814
This is a fix for MC/DC issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78453
in which a ConditionalOperator that evaluates a complex condition was
incorrectly updating its global bitmap after visiting its L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Alan Phipps (evodius96)
Changes
This is a fix for MC/DC issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78453
in which a ConditionalOperator that evaluates a complex condition was
incorrectly updating its global bitmap after vis
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78813
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/malavikasamak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78815
The patch fixes the crash introduced by the DataInvocation warning gadget
designed to warn against unsafe invocations of span::data method.
Radar: 121223051
>From 6334cd361f79fc79f32b8ca95c6f31a083704332
https://github.com/ributzka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78816
`OptimizationLevel` and `OptimizeSize` can affect the generated AST. They
indirectly affect the `Optimize` and `OptimizeSize` frontend options, which in
turn set predefined macro definitions.
This fixes rdar://1
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Malavika Samak (malavikasamak)
Changes
The patch fixes the crash introduced by the DataInvocation warning gadget
designed to warn against unsafe invocations of span::data method.
Radar: 121223051
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/ll
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Juergen Ributzka (ributzka)
Changes
`OptimizationLevel` and `OptimizeSize` can affect the generated AST. They
indirectly affect the `Optimize` and `OptimizeSize` frontend options, which in
turn set predefined macro definitions.
This fixes
https://github.com/malavikasamak edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/malavikasamak edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77393
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ributzka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78816
>From ba6eac97038a8fbd24d288ffa88a4dcf508e66b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juergen Ributzka
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:10:03 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][modules] Fix CodeGen options that can affect the
https://github.com/JonPsson1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73511
>From 5c1c5d401775089bc600b85227f5e7bd974d4bd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Paulsson
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:22:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Initial Also handle weak symbols Fix test for -emit-llvm
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
//===--===//
#include "SystemZ.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
JonPsson1 wrote:
Ah, one more #include to remove that I missed - thanks :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
zygoloid wrote:
> My answer for the question "what's the semantics of GCC's builtin X?" has
> always been "whatever GCC does." It's the best we can rely upon. But then we
> get into situations like this, where you and @nikic have one interpretation
> of their documentation and I have another.
https://github.com/mtrofin approved this pull request.
Thanks for adding license info!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72319
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 approved this pull request.
LGTM! Feel free to ignore my comment if it doesn't make sense to you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
@@ -2263,15 +2263,27 @@ class UnsafeBufferUsageReporter : public
UnsafeBufferUsageHandler {
MsgParam = 3;
} else if (const auto *ECE = dyn_cast(Operation)) {
QualType destType = ECE->getType();
-const uint64_t dSize =
-Ctx.getTypeSize(
https://github.com/tstellar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78823
The option is LLVM_RELEASE_ENABLE_PGO and it's turned on by default.
>From b23e23f862bec32e42fa7aa96da1fe0c4ed38a54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 06:44:32 +
Subject: [PAT
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar)
Changes
The option is LLVM_RELEASE_ENABLE_PGO and it's turned on by default.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78823.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Release.cmake (+5
bwendling wrote:
> > My answer for the question "what's the semantics of GCC's builtin X?" has
> > always been "whatever GCC does." It's the best we can rely upon. But then
> > we get into situations like this, where you and @nikic have one
> > interpretation of their documentation and I have
https://github.com/bd1976bris updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75364
>From 97efed8c73aed4fdca5510013c844e84953ec256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Dunbobbin
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:07:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Sema] Provide `-fno-/-fvisibility-global-new-delete`
opt
tstellar wrote:
This commit broke the [ llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib
bot](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/196/builds/42821)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72319
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/var-const updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77164
>From e28e7b3e1337cb960cdc8028a70a43740fa7d636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Varlamov
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:36:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++][hardening] Classify assertions related to le
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4f215fdd62d3f014750339eab9a46946b6fb1c4a
c6fb1dea762178e7b850c5f13da9aaa28723eb21 --
https://github.com/var-const updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77176
>From f86839d0bfc8b2070127dc3b2c609c2b3f7239ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Varlamov
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 20:08:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++][hardening] Don't trigger redundant checks in
https://github.com/var-const updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77164
>From e28e7b3e1337cb960cdc8028a70a43740fa7d636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Varlamov
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:36:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libc++][hardening] Classify assertions related to le
Author: Ben Dunbobbin
Date: 2024-01-20T01:35:06Z
New Revision: fd49ef1eb3de7eb2be5f7ddd469a005917cc1988
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fd49ef1eb3de7eb2be5f7ddd469a005917cc1988
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fd49ef1eb3de7eb2be5f7ddd469a005917cc1988.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/felix642 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73069
From 286c4445f8cba6ea2f49fb9e8f732f04ebdb6c97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine=20Constantin?=
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 22:03:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[clang-tidy]=C2=A0Added=
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
>From 1a1ae44bc9b937f8a79afa3b40c7ad32e1fde8dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp | 12 ++--
https://github.com/antangelo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78670
>From 227504aa6da6dd2199c83563b9149dd3873e1a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Abbatangelo
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:27:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Reland "[clang] Fix CTAD for aggregates for nested templa
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
>From e8a5715a6255bc110823dbe36734bb7bd17753d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] fix outline member function template with
default align c
https://github.com/Bigcheese approved this pull request.
LGTM, although are we sure none of the other options should be affecting? I
just did a quick search and it seems like this is it.
I don't think it matters here, but the actual option that controls the macro is
on `LangOptions` and where
https://github.com/jcsxky edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
>From 9bb08560d401018cc63dc3b3e635c4f95cad7819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] fix outline member function template with
default align c
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
>From 07b6d2105b84ba045bc8093ac0541d2db6e29cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] fix outline member function template with
default align c
@@ -598,3 +600,27 @@ namespace B {
}
void g(B::X x) { A::f(x); }
}
+
+namespace static_operator {
+#if __cplusplus >= 201703L
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
> No way to modify things in a C++11/14 constexpr function (`++x` is not a
> constant expression), so no way t
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
WenleiHe wrote:
Any follow ups on this patch? Once it's in we'd like to give it a try as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69535
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
Author: Ben Shi
Date: 2024-01-20T11:02:40+08:00
New Revision: 02232307ce18c095ef0bf26b5cef23e4efbc1e4b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02232307ce18c095ef0bf26b5cef23e4efbc1e4b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02232307ce18c095ef0bf26b5cef23e4efbc1e4b.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/benshi001 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
seanm wrote:
@bwendling is there any plan / possibility for simple expressions (with no side
effects)? Like:
```c
struct libusb_bos_dev_capability_descriptor {
uint8_t bLength;
uint8_t bDescriptorType;
uint8_t bDevCapabilityType;
uint8_t dev_capability_data[
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77943
>From 537d283288f555c2bb7cff90aee89fe9b18f08b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:31:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tid]fix modernize-use-auto incorrect fix hints for
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/benshi001 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76979
___
cfe-commi
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
.ArgConstraint(NotNull(A
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/benshi001 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76979
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
.ArgConstraint(NotNull(A
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
.ArgConstraint(NotNull(A
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
.ArgConstraint(NotNull(A
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2201,6 +2214,56 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
ErrnoNEZeroIrrelevant, GenericFailureMsg)
benshi001 wrote:
> I have already a working code to simplify code repetitions, but want to merge
> first patches #76979 and #78180 (@NagyDonat could you look at these too?).
How about merge this patch first, then apply your simplification one? Since my
current one also is affected.
https://gi
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
//===--===//
#include "SystemZ.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
chapuni wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73511
_
https://github.com/chapuni approved this pull request.
Looks good from my side -- please wait for other opinions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
jyknight wrote:
BTW, please don't rebase/amend commits and force-push, it makes a it extremely
difficult to review the changes since the previous review -- especially if the
new changes are commingled with a rebase.
Much better to simply push new commits on top of your existing branch. And if
antangelo wrote:
Thanks for the review! Apologies for the delayed response but I'm available to
merge this in now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
Author: antangelo
Date: 2024-01-19T23:06:44-05:00
New Revision: b3ea9b398fe656fab5d78d6b2c58bba975badc07
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3ea9b398fe656fab5d78d6b2c58bba975badc07
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3ea9b398fe656fab5d78d6b2c58bba975badc07.diff
LOG
https://github.com/antangelo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zingam closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zingam closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zingam closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78157
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcsxky updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78400
>From 774f1abbe16cd642b0838105f68e5c5d02e37aef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: huqizhi
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:16:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] fix outline member function template with
default align c
@@ -1401,17 +1406,48 @@ void AsmPrinter::emitBBAddrMapSection(const
MachineFunction &MF) {
uint8_t BBAddrMapVersion = OutStreamer->getContext().getBBAddrMapVersion();
OutStreamer->emitInt8(BBAddrMapVersion);
OutStreamer->AddComment("feature");
- auto FeaturesBits = stat
vitalybuka wrote:
Yes, it fixes the leak but on asan bot it's mismatch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/18159/steps/10/logs/stdio
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78333
>From 837a9fd2c1fac7dcdf2c8538e6634eccf36ee7b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 23:46:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Fix `--save-temps` for OpenCL AoT compilation
We
101 - 200 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
