https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89706
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tlively approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tlively approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89778
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1441,6 +1441,10 @@ void HeaderSearch::MarkFileModuleHeader(FileEntryRef FE,
HFI.isCompilingModuleHeader |= isCompilingModuleHeader;
}
+void HeaderSearch::EnteredTextualFile(FileEntryRef File) {
+ getFileInfo(File).isCompilingModuleHeader = true;
sam-mcc
mydeveloperday wrote:
I'm ok with removing it if @owenca and @HazardyKnusperkeks are.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89706
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tlively edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tlively approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -147,19 +147,25 @@ void
WebAssemblyTargetInfo::setFeatureEnabled(llvm::StringMap &Features,
bool WebAssemblyTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
llvm::StringMap &Features, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags, StringRef CPU,
const std::vector &FeaturesVec) const {
- if (CPU == "bleedin
https://github.com/jyknight commented:
I think having the on-by-default diagnostic before we release this
functionality is critically important -- but the primarily-useful part of that
is going to be for the public libc++ APIs which expose these values (and, that
already landed in mainline).
https://github.com/jyknight edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1792,6 +1792,11 @@ class TargetInfo : public TransferrableTargetInfo,
/// Whether to support HIP image/texture API's.
virtual bool hasHIPImageSupport() const { return true; }
+ /// The minimum offset between two objects to avoid false sharing.
jyknigh
@@ -1792,6 +1792,11 @@ class TargetInfo : public TransferrableTargetInfo,
/// Whether to support HIP image/texture API's.
virtual bool hasHIPImageSupport() const { return true; }
+ /// The minimum offset between two objects to avoid false sharing.
+ virtual unsigned hard
@@ -147,19 +147,25 @@ void
WebAssemblyTargetInfo::setFeatureEnabled(llvm::StringMap &Features,
bool WebAssemblyTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
llvm::StringMap &Features, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags, StringRef CPU,
const std::vector &FeaturesVec) const {
- if (CPU == "bleedin
nico wrote:
> I would suggest we revert this - and at least collect all the observed side
> effects and declare them before considering relanding it.
That sounds good to me. Do you have a list of PRs to revert?
> ... then we do still get the old name embedded.
Sure. The motivation on our sid
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
I don't see a use case for that comment, and thus I see no problem in removing
it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-04-23T21:09:36+02:00
New Revision: dc8f6a8cdad427345a60f5142411617df521c303
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc8f6a8cdad427345a60f5142411617df521c303
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc8f6a8cdad427345a60f5142411617df521c303.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
This patch will finally allow us to mark C++17 support in clang as complete.
This is a continuation of the review process from an [old PR in
phab](https://reviews.llvm.org/D109496).
Recap: The original patch f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This patch will finally allow us to mark C++17 support in clang as complete.
This is a continuation of the review process from an [old PR in
phab](https://reviews.llvm.org/D109496).
Recap: The original
@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ static bool handleFloatFloatBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
// If during the evaluation of an expression, the result is not
// mathematically defined [...], the behavior is undefined.
// FIXME: C++ rules require us to not conform
mstorsjo wrote:
> > I would suggest we revert this - and at least collect all the observed side
> > effects and declare them before considering relanding it.
>
> That sounds good to me. Do you have a list of PRs to revert?
Not sure if there are follow-up fixes, sorry, but the discussed PRs are
https://github.com/hekota created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89809
Fixes #89802
>From 22b67d30ca087d6a912183039c87fd1790eedfe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:49:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add environment parameter to clang availability attr
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
We probably need to attach this to ClangABI as well, this is an ABI breaking
change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6561,7 +6561,7 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
if (const Arg *A =
Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fvisibility_global_new_delete_hidden)) {
D.Diag(diag::warn_drv_deprecated_arg)
-<< A->getAsString(Args)
+<< A->ge
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 78eb2c2cba5ad0f9a36ec1959371527313a76bbe
22b67d30ca087d6a912183039c87fd1790eedfe4 --
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Also needs a release note, entry into breaking changes, and a post on mailing
list or whatever for the 'breaking change' subscribers to pay attention to.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-
https://github.com/Troy-Butler updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89512
>From f03466fa44a3c7210e7590e6305bc0c9f9aeb446 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy-Butler
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:13:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix Definition-Declaration Mismatches
Signed-off-by: Troy-
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88182
>From 426e74cabb003eb5dc83adf347a5800d49bc87b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:49:12 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Start migrating away from the embedded assumption that
the defa
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
https://github.com/Troy-Butler updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89512
>From f03466fa44a3c7210e7590e6305bc0c9f9aeb446 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy-Butler
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:13:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Fix Definition-Declaration Mismatches
Signed-off-by: Troy-
https://github.com/sam-mccall edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sam-mccall approved this pull request.
Thanks! This looks good, much neater than my approach.
I'm interested in whether the DirectUses change is related to this, and would
like to slap on a couple of tests.
But either way, this looks good and it would be great to have it lan
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// This test checks that a module map with a textual header can be marked as
sam-mccall wrote:
This is a useful test, I think there are a couple of other affecting-ness
properties that are important to test:
- that a textual header that *is*
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ GetAffectingModuleMaps(const Preprocessor &PP, Module
*RootModule) {
continue;
const HeaderFileInfo *HFI = HS.getExistingLocalFileInfo(*File);
-if (!HFI || (HFI->isModuleHeader && !HFI->isCompilingModuleHeader))
+if (!HFI || (HFI->isModul
@@ -237,6 +238,8 @@ GetAffectingModuleMaps(const Preprocessor &PP, Module
*RootModule) {
CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(CurrentModule);
for (const Module *ImportedModule : CurrentModule->Imports)
CollectIncludingMapsFromAncestors(ImportedModule);
+for (con
https://github.com/tahonermann approved this pull request.
Looks good to me, thanks @smanna12!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
mstorsjo wrote:
> > The recent changes, #81037 and #87866, were (as far as I know) only
> > intended to change what is printed as error messages, when neither is
> > found, to help users correct their setup for the new style layout. But
> > those changes also seem to have unexpected effects in
https://github.com/Troy-Butler updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89512
>From f03466fa44a3c7210e7590e6305bc0c9f9aeb446 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy-Butler
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:13:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Fix Definition-Declaration Mismatches
Signed-off-by: Troy-
@@ -147,19 +147,25 @@ void
WebAssemblyTargetInfo::setFeatureEnabled(llvm::StringMap &Features,
bool WebAssemblyTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
llvm::StringMap &Features, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags, StringRef CPU,
const std::vector &FeaturesVec) const {
- if (CPU == "bleedin
https://github.com/vgvassilev created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
Depends on #89804.
>From 8317ce33d07d0986e314de0b39aa977f784e0619 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:07:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-repl] Extend the C support.
https://github.com/tstellar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89812
Completely refactor the cache file to simplify it and remove unnecessary
variables. The main functional change here is that the non-PGO builds now use
two stages, so `ninja -C build stage2-package` can be used
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vassil Vassilev (vgvassilev)
Changes
Depends on #89804.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp (+11-2)
- (modified) clang/lib/Inter
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar)
Changes
Completely refactor the cache file to simplify it and remove unnecessary
variables. The main functional change here is that the non-PGO builds now use
two stages, so `ninja -C build stage2-package` can be
@@ -2554,16 +2554,27 @@ Decl *Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclarator(
return ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(D, TemplateInfo);
}
+static bool isConstexprVariable(const Decl *D) {
+ if (const VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast_if_present(D))
+return Var->isConstexpr()
@@ -141,46 +149,98 @@ PPC_LNX_CPU("power10",47)
#define AIX_BUILTIN_PPC_TRUE 1
#define AIX_BUILTIN_PPC_FALSE 0
#define USE_SYS_CONF 2
-
- // Supported COMPARE_OP values.
- #define COMP_EQ 0
-
+ #define SYS_CALL 3
#endif
// The value of SUPPORT_METHOD can be AIX_BU
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0 -emit-llvm -o - %s |
FileCheck %s
+
+int main() {
+ int ret = 0;
+ ret += __builtin_cpu_supports("vsx");
+ ret += __builtin_cpu_supports("htm");
+ ret += __builtin_cpu_supports("cellbe");
+ ret += __builti
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
@@ -2554,16 +2554,27 @@ Decl *Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclarator(
return ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(D, TemplateInfo);
}
+static bool isConstexprVariable(const Decl *D) {
+ if (const VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast_if_present(D))
+return Var->isConstexpr()
@@ -54,3 +56,289 @@ void SPIRV64TargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
BaseSPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(Opts, Builder);
DefineStd(Builder, "SPIRV64", Opts);
}
+
+static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfo[] = {
+#define BUILTIN(ID, TYPE, ATTRS)
https://github.com/jhuber6 commented:
How much of this is actually different from the existing target info for
AMDGCN? Seems like we're doing a lot of redundant stuff like defining macros or
features.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
_
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spirv64-amd-amdhsa -x hip \
+// RUN: -aux-triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fcuda-is-device -emit-llvm %s \
+// RUN: -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// RUN: %clang_
@@ -89,6 +89,19 @@ sections with improvements to Clang's support for those
languages.
C++ Language Changes
+C++17 Feature Support
+^
+- Clang now exposes ``__GCC_DESTRUCTIVE_SIZE`` and ``__GCC_CONSTRUCTIVE_SIZE``
+ predefined macros t
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ static bool handleFloatFloatBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
// If during the evaluation of an expression, the result is not
// mathematically defined [...], the behavior is undefined.
// FIXME: C++ rules require us to not conform
@@ -2554,16 +2554,27 @@ Decl *Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclarator(
return ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(D, TemplateInfo);
}
+static bool isConstexprVariable(const Decl *D) {
+ if (const VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast_if_present(D))
+return Var->isConstexpr()
@@ -2554,16 +2554,27 @@ Decl *Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclarator(
return ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(D, TemplateInfo);
}
+static bool isConstexprVariable(const Decl *D) {
+ if (const VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast_if_present(D))
+return Var->isConstexpr()
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel commented:
Other side notes:
fmin and frexp can signal exceptions if the input is an sNaN, which causes
[library.c]p3 to kick in. (That's the only time these operations can signal an
exception.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84384
>From ef23d427b48687b62da9e1062886ddfcc1649b6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John McCall
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:31:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Abstract serialization fixes for the Apple Clang changes.
---
AlexVlx wrote:
> How much of this is actually different from the existing target info for
> AMDGCN? Seems like we're doing a lot of redundant stuff like defining macros
> or features.
That's part of the point, it's not actually supposed to differ in those
particular regards, up to the point w
kovdan01 wrote:
@AaronBallman @rjmccall Please see 53485b1e7f7c60253b8734e95ae9b9a04e9e7a95
commit which makes `Mask` 64-bit and removes separate `PtrAuth` field in
`Qualifiers`. The performance becomes better:
- before
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=3ae10fde39419d7c98
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
>From 9165d6086e2570198fba1c333d0c9cb9c09037c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:13:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][modules] Allow module map files with textual
head
@@ -54,3 +56,289 @@ void SPIRV64TargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
BaseSPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(Opts, Builder);
DefineStd(Builder, "SPIRV64", Opts);
}
+
+static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfo[] = {
+#define BUILTIN(ID, TYPE, ATTRS)
@@ -147,19 +147,25 @@ void
WebAssemblyTargetInfo::setFeatureEnabled(llvm::StringMap &Features,
bool WebAssemblyTargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
llvm::StringMap &Features, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags, StringRef CPU,
const std::vector &FeaturesVec) const {
- if (CPU == "bleedin
https://github.com/dschuff edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dschuff approved this pull request.
(also LGTM FTR)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3597,8 +3597,13 @@ class ASTIdentifierTableTrait {
/// doesn't check whether the name has macros defined; use
PublicMacroIterator
/// to check that.
bool isInterestingIdentifier(const IdentifierInfo *II, uint64_t MacroOffset)
{
-if (MacroOffset || II->isPoisoned
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89809
>From 22b67d30ca087d6a912183039c87fd1790eedfe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:49:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add environment parameter to clang availability attribute
---
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: S. Bharadwaj Yadavalli (bharadwajy)
Changes
An earlier commit provided a way to decouple DXIL version from Shader Model
version by representing the DXIL version as `SubArch` in the DXIL Target Triple
and a
jhuber6 wrote:
> > How much of this is actually different from the existing target info for
> > AMDGCN? Seems like we're doing a lot of redundant stuff like defining
> > macros or features.
>
> That's part of the point, it's not actually supposed to differ in those
> particular regards, up to
https://github.com/diggerlin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82809
>From 557e7163d744890aadfa703a81a0c4f2cd112517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhijian
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:23:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Implement a subset of builtin_cpu_supports() features
---
clang
AlexVlx wrote:
> > > How much of this is actually different from the existing target info for
> > > AMDGCN? Seems like we're doing a lot of redundant stuff like defining
> > > macros or features.
> >
> >
> > That's part of the point, it's not actually supposed to differ in those
> > particul
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// This test checks that a module map with a textual header can be marked as
jansvoboda11 wrote:
This patch unfortunately doesn't pass that test (on line 44) due to
[this](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441/files#r1576422103): when
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
>From 9165d6086e2570198fba1c333d0c9cb9c09037c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:13:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][modules] Allow module map files with textual
head
jhuber6 wrote:
> That's not a bad idea but I _suspect_ we'll run into a physical design issue
> since there doesn't seem to be a natural place to put the shared base -
> unless you were thinking about a place in particular? We'd probably have to
> relocate this to the AMDGCN side, and then dup
pogo59 wrote:
> My recollection of the past discussions is that we want users to switch to
> the new hierarchy.
Is Microsoft a "user" who agreed to this change? Was clang-vendors tagged on
this discussion about a new file hierarchy? I don't recall it. The library name
change is news to me, a
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3ea5dff0efdbb4bf5590d882810aa42f9ec26e4e
ac069f486a197221adb6520d76ac8aaa74995947 --
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
>From 9165d6086e2570198fba1c333d0c9cb9c09037c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:13:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][modules] Allow module map files with textual
head
https://github.com/komalverma04 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89553
>From 4a56db71e8bf2b6414cd305515d9d4434be8efc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: komalverma04
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 02:37:25 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] remove IgnoreParenImpCasts() from hasArgument matcher
--
@@ -5016,3 +5041,345 @@ void AutoType::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID,
const ASTContext &Context) {
Profile(ID, Context, getDeducedType(), getKeyword(), isDependentType(),
getTypeConstraintConcept(), getTypeConstraintArguments());
}
+
+StringRef FunctionEffect:
@@ -3637,6 +3637,28 @@ FunctionProtoType::FunctionProtoType(QualType result,
ArrayRef params,
auto &EllipsisLoc = *getTrailingObjects();
EllipsisLoc = epi.EllipsisLoc;
}
+
+ if (!epi.FunctionEffects.empty()) {
+auto &ExtraBits = *getTrailingObjects();
+// TO
@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ static bool handleFloatFloatBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
// If during the evaluation of an expression, the result is not
// mathematically defined [...], the behavior is undefined.
// FIXME: C++ rules require us to not conform
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80475
>From 971cc613e994a308f939f68247257b65e04c74fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Cranmer
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:35:29 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Disable FTZ/DAZ when compiling shared libraries by
de
jcranmer-intel wrote:
Ping for review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80475
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89828
Consider this code:
```c++
template
struct Overloaded : Ts... { using Ts::operator()...; };
template
Overloaded(Ts...) -> Overloaded;
void f() {
int x;
Overloaded o {
[&](this auto& self) {
retu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (Sirraide)
Changes
Consider this code:
```c++
template
struct Overloaded : Ts... { using Ts::operator()...; };
template
Overloaded(Ts...) -> Overloaded;
void f() {
int x;
Overloade
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
>From 9165d6086e2570198fba1c333d0c9cb9c09037c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:13:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang][modules] Allow module map files with textual
head
@@ -98,9 +100,47 @@ std::optional tryParseProfile(StringRef
Profile) {
else if (llvm::getAsUnsignedInteger(Parts[2], 0, Minor))
return std::nullopt;
- // dxil-unknown-shadermodel-hull
+ // Determine DXIL version number using the minor version number of Shader
+ // Mo
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY InstCombinerImpl final
Value *foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
Instruction *CxtI, bool IsAnd,
bool IsLogical = false);
-
efriedma-quic wrote:
If you have a select with both wrapping and non-wrapping operands, is the
result wrapping? If you declare a variable as both wrapping and non-wrapping,
is it wrapping? If you declare a function parameter both wrapping and
non-wrapping, is it wrapping? If you assign to a
jcranmer-intel wrote:
> I'm not sure what the correct behavior is across all platforms. My
> perspective on this is heavily X86-biased, so I'd really like some guidance
> from people who work on other targets about their expectations. I think I saw
> at least one target that sets denormal-fp-m
efriedma-quic wrote:
The C standard is small enough that if you comb through the C grammar
carefully, you can probably come up with explicitly rules for all the important
constructs, and verify they work. There's probably still a long tail of weird
interactions with current and future clang e
pranavk wrote:
This commit is still problematic. Minimal reproducer
(https://godbolt.org/z/hE7M8EfT1).
We should get this reverted again.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
301 - 400 of 523 matches
Mail list logo
