llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amit Tiwari (amitamd7)
Changes
Added support for detecting OMP Target Directive and OMP From Clause in Clang
Unit Test Framework
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150580.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/amitamd7 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150580
Added support for detecting OMP Target Directive and OMP From Clause in Clang
Unit Test Framework
>From 846d871783d572667cb8bdb954961f274e04702c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amtiwari
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (petergrind3)
Changes
Sometimes between April 2023 and today the option disappeared. I wasn't able to
trace when it went away through the different refactoring.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150575.diff
petergrind3 wrote:
I did not see a way to add a test for this change. Please advice is there is,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150575
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/petergrind3 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150575
Sometimes between April 2023 and today the option disappeared. I wasn't able to
trace when it went away through the different refactoring.
>From 20745528ddd459d2f77b677e3f22118d810e8741 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Maetveis wrote:
ping @michalpaszkowski
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150393
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 9
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang-extra".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/337
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
> Style Guide has been updated internally. I don't know how long it takes to
> make its way to the public site, so I'd like to proceed. I've pasted the
> updated text into the commit description above.
I still think we should wait until it becomes official. WDYT @mydeveloperday
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
>From d8e460ad55c4e2353ee507c5f03eb344a46353e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:16:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] precommit test for function comments
---
.../clang-d
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-07-24T19:49:54-07:00
New Revision: 2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653.diff
L
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ def riscv_sret_glue : RVSDNode<"SRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
def riscv_mret_glue : RVSDNode<"MRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
+def riscv_mnret_glue : RVSD
@@ -22259,6 +22260,10 @@ SDValue RISCVTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(
reportFatalUsageError(
"'SiFive-CLIC-*' interrupt kinds require XSfmclic extension");
+if (Kind == "rnmi" && !Subtarget.hasStdExtSmrnmi())
+ reportFatalUsageError("Handling of
https://github.com/lenary edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148134
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks for looking into this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
gamesh411 wrote:
The overall check implementation looks great. Once the name is settled, it is
ready IMO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140086
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
https://github.com/gamesh411 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/gamesh411 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150417
From 0630d81e544319a1a18798996760775d4a13f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Endre=20F=C3=BCl=C3=B6p?=
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:49:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Add StoreToImmutabl
https://github.com/gamesh411 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+//=== StoreToImmutableChecker.cpp - Store to immutable memory checker -*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identi
https://github.com/thurstond edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2595,6 +2595,16 @@ def fsanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
def fno_sanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
: Flag<["-"], "fno-sanitize-undefined-trap-on-error">,
Group,
Alias, AliasArgs<["undefined"]>;
+defm sanitize_annotate_debug_info_traps
+: BoolFOption<
+
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=alpha.core.StoreToImmutable
-verify %s
+
+// Test basic functionality of StoreToImmutable checker
+// This tests direct writes to immutable regions without function modeling
+
+// Direct write to a const global varia
jeremyd2019 wrote:
I made a quick test and I'm seeing `_ZdlPvm` being used for `operator delete`
and that is not being wrapped. That may need to be wrapped too, because it
calls `__wrap__Znwm` which calls `default_cygwin_cxx_malloc`, but `_ZdlPvm`
which is the version from libc++.dll.
https:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@tcottin Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
https://github.com/emaxx-google closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140498
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: tcottin
Date: 2025-07-25T02:45:56+02:00
New Revision: 51994891e3a28a999e30a915d9ac5c2102073576
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/51994891e3a28a999e30a915d9ac5c2102073576
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/51994891e3a28a999e30a915d9ac5c2102073576.diff
LOG:
jeremyd2019 wrote:
I was thinking that `-u` wouldn't do anything useful (and I'm still thinking
that), but I just had a thought about why you might think it's necessary (or,
why it might not work as expected).
`--wrap` renames the definition to `__real_X` and references to `__wrap_X`. If
lib
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This adds standard-comforming handling for calls to functions that were
declared in C source in the no prototype form.
---
Patch is 22.53 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150553
This adds standard-comforming handling for calls to functions that were
declared in C source in the no prototype form.
>From 77391e361f5c40baca8974dce31d3d007ac97c4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylo
delcypher wrote:
@anthonyhatran Oh and don't forget about
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145967#discussion_r2229499715 as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
https://github.com/delcypher approved this pull request.
LGTM. Let's wait for @thurstond to respond regarding the flag name.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+//=== StoreToImmutableChecker.cpp - Store to immutable memory checker -*- C++
+//-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identi
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
LGTM, but I'd like a second set of eyes on this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150106
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
tyan0 wrote:
> I mean many parts of `check-cxx` crash. `cygc++-1.dll` indeed exports `_Znwm`.
I see. _Znwm etc. are mangled name for `new` and `delete`.
```
_Znwm: operator new
_Znam: operator new[]
_ZdlPv: operator delete
_ZdaPv: operator delete[]
_ZnwmRKSt9nothrow_t: operator new(std::nothrow)
@@ -2595,6 +2595,16 @@ def fsanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
def fno_sanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
: Flag<["-"], "fno-sanitize-undefined-trap-on-error">,
Group,
Alias, AliasArgs<["undefined"]>;
+defm sanitize_annotate_debug_info_traps
+: BoolFOption<
+
mizvekov wrote:
Yeah, the PR description says so.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149782
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2595,6 +2595,16 @@ def fsanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
def fno_sanitize_undefined_trap_on_error
: Flag<["-"], "fno-sanitize-undefined-trap-on-error">,
Group,
Alias, AliasArgs<["undefined"]>;
+defm sanitize_annotate_debug_info_traps
+: BoolFOption<
+
https://github.com/rampitec approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150540
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JustinStitt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
@@ -227,6 +227,53 @@ bool SemaWasm::BuiltinWasmTableCopy(CallExpr *TheCall) {
return false;
}
+bool SemaWasm::BuiltinWasmTestFunctionPointerSignature(CallExpr *TheCall) {
+ if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 1))
+return true;
+
+ Expr *FuncPtrArg = TheCall->getArg(0);
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kiran Chandramohan
Date: 2025-07-24T21:54:26+01:00
New Revision: efe1aa8904ea3ad8b19ab2aa5660e27a08c7d694
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efe1aa8904ea3ad8b19ab2aa5660e27a08c7d694
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efe1aa8904ea3ad8b19ab2aa5660e27a08c7d694.
https://github.com/Icohedron closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Deric C.
Date: 2025-07-24T13:54:00-07:00
New Revision: ed9a1027a482d18b3cf063e8bcc6e31a4c7dc024
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed9a1027a482d18b3cf063e8bcc6e31a4c7dc024
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed9a1027a482d18b3cf063e8bcc6e31a4c7dc024.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This change implements correct lowering of function aliases to the LLVM dialect.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150520.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CIR/Lowering
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150520
This change implements correct lowering of function aliases to the LLVM dialect.
>From 88039a468792435666e3026b5bf42ad31405d332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:14:35 -070
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-07-24T22:23:30+02:00
New Revision: 1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95.diff
LO
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang,flang,mlir` at step
6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/bui
@@ -2852,20 +2852,28 @@ void CodeGenModule::ConstructAttributeList(StringRef
Name,
if (AI.getInReg())
Attrs.addAttribute(llvm::Attribute::InReg);
- // Depending on the ABI, this may be either a byval or a dead_on_return
- // argument.
- if (AI.get
https://github.com/spall edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spall approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12908,6 +12908,14 @@ def err_sycl_special_type_num_init_method : Error<
"types with 'sycl_special_class' attribute must have one and only one
'__init' "
"method defined">;
+// SYCL external attribute diagnostics
+def err_sycl_attribute_invalid_linkage : Error<
+ "'sy
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-07-24T23:03:17+03:00
New Revision: 46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0.diff
vbvictor wrote:
I will make the renaming on the next PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
>From 32c9e86d027efc84ba696a38ef626ae04d306ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kiran Chandramohan
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:33:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[flang][flang-driver][mlir][OpenMP] atomi
andykaylor wrote:
I'm not sure the combined warning is necessary. I think just stating that the
clang option overrides the GCC option is sufficient since there is no sense in
which clang-specific options can be incompatible with GCC if GCC doesn't
implement the option.
I think we're all in ag
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142312
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Mike Crowe
Date: 2025-07-24T22:40:41+03:00
New Revision: 60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa.diff
LO
anchuraj wrote:
Thank you for the revert. I was away and couldn't revert it. Will take a look
when I am back.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn -cl-std=clc++ -verify %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+#define fold(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? (x) : (x))
+static_assert(nullptr != fold(reinterpret_cast(0)));
+
+static_assert(nullptr == (private int *)0);
+
---
bob80905 wrote:
Looked over the DXC codebase and didn't find any hits on deadonreturn, so yeah
I think such a test wouldn't make sense.
But, then, wouldn't this be a better approach?
```
// Depending on the ABI, this may be either a byval or a dead_on_return
// argument.
klausler wrote:
Reversion might be overkill. Maybe the test can just be disabled with an
`!XFAIL: *` or similar until the author can fix it up.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150493
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anchuraj approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
Author: Kiran Chandramohan (kiranchandramohan)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#143441
Reverting due to CI failure
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53/builds/18055.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1505
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
Author: Kiran Chandramohan (kiranchandramohan)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#143441
Reverting due to CI failure
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53/builds/18055.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504.
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#143441
Reverting due to CI failure
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53/builds/18055.
>From 32c9e86d027efc84ba696a38ef626ae04d306ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ki
klausler wrote:
llvm-project/main fails to build on x86-64 Linux:
```
Testing:
FAIL: Flang :: Lower/OpenMP/atomic-control-options.f90 (1 of 3701)
TEST 'Flang :: Lower/OpenMP/atomic-control-options.f90'
FAILED
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
/h
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/naoNao89 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150365
From 2d9ae771247af025d6319c044e9f8727e9bebfd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: naoNao89 <90588855+naona...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:54:02 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][StaticAnalyze
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150497
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-07-24T12:18:52-07:00
New Revision: 7dc27267eb7ef53638c2fc46ba70dfad182ec45c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7dc27267eb7ef53638c2fc46ba70dfad182ec45c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7dc27267eb7ef53638c2fc46ba70dfad182ec45c.diff
L
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
Not sure if we want to wait on the upstream review in google/benchmark?
Otherwise LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150068
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_wasm_ref_is_null_extern, "ii",
"nct", "reference-types"
// return type.
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_wasm_ref_null_func, "i", "nct", "reference-types")
+// Check if the runtime type of a function pointer matches its static type.
Used
https://github.com/rampitec edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150493
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rampitec closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Stanislav Mekhanoshin
Date: 2025-07-24T12:13:59-07:00
New Revision: 9deb7f6062ce7a58c2f43c6c0fec869f9f0c7fc2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9deb7f6062ce7a58c2f43c6c0fec869f9f0c7fc2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9deb7f6062ce7a58c2f43c6c0fec869f9f0c7f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This adds support for array cleanups, including the ArrayDtor op.
---
Patch is 20.81 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150499.diff
8 Files Affect
https://github.com/jmmartinez updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137665
From a701cd52fb572fb3b0f1f2f6dd96f77db632d2ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Juan=20Manuel=20Martinez=20Caama=C3=B1o?=
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:05:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Pre-commit test: [Pr
https://github.com/dpaoliello updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150068
>From 8e6ec9a09cda6ffdbfd91250fae186ba8585dbf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Paoliello
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:17:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes to unblock building LLVM and Clang as Arm64EC
---
Icohedron wrote:
> Is it worth adding a test that would have added DeadOnReturn attribute, but
> now doesn't? Or is that covered by plenty of other tests currently?
I don't know in what cases a DeadOnReturn attribute would be added in HLSL, so
I'm not sure how to write a test for that.
https:
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150499
This adds support for array cleanups, including the ArrayDtor op.
>From 13c8a3d27a92808485ed594d7f4f57c3597ee884 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:56:44 -0700
Subject: [PAT
https://github.com/bob80905 commented:
Is it worth adding a test that would have added DeadOnReturn attribute, but now
doesn't? Or is that covered by plenty of other tests currently?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mai
https://github.com/dpaoliello edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150068
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dpaoliello updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150068
>From 7c573fb412a0701e7e5573d989c42ff14d906129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Paoliello
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:17:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes to unblock building LLVM and Clang as Arm64EC
---
dpaoliello wrote:
> ```
> -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS="-Xlinker /MACHINE:ARM64EC"
> -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS="-Xlinker /MACHINE:ARM64EC"
> ```
>
> Does clang not pick the right MACHINE automatically? I thought we had code
> for that.
Trying it out now, it looks like it is working fine without
https://github.com/dpaoliello updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150068
>From 0231022256d5e600853bec6a511f413a011801a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Paoliello
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:17:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes to unblock building LLVM and Clang as Arm64EC
---
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
