ADKaster wrote:
@AaronBallman @Sirraide would this patch be reasonable to backport to the 18.x
release branch? It fixes a problem with our application on the FreeBSD-CURRENT
branch. https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/23365
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83103
ADKaster wrote:
Yeah seems llvm prefers not to force push PRs, but to keep stacking commits.
The squashed commit will have the PR description as the final commit
description. The compare button is a bit useless when it has a bunch of changes
from main on it
ADKaster wrote:
@HighCommander4 @sam-mccall do you have any capacity to review this change? It
would be nice to get it into the 18 release if the window hasn't closed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
ADKaster wrote:
> SerenityOS is an OS, independent from Windows. What does porting it to
> Windows mean? Build some SerenityOS components on Windows targeting the PE
> object file format?
In this case, Dan is referring to future plans to port the Ladybird browser to
x86_64-windows-msvc. The
@@ -483,6 +483,56 @@ struct FragmentCompiler {
FullyQualifiedNamespaces.begin(), FullyQualifiedNamespaces.end());
});
}
+auto QuotedFilter = compileHeaderRegexes(F.QuotedHeaders);
+if (QuotedFilter.has_value()) {
+ Out.Apply.push_back(
+
