[clang] [clang-tools-extra] [libcxx] [C++17] Support __GCC_[CON|DE]STRUCTIVE_SIZE (PR #89446)

pinskia wrote: https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/74 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89446 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [C] Disable use of NRVO (PR #101038)

pinskia wrote: Note the C++ issue with NRVO is https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2868.html . https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101038 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

[clang] nonblocking/nonallocating attributes (was: nolock/noalloc) (PR #84983)

pinskia wrote: Well assume attribute is a good example of where gcc and clang disagree and might cause issues. Gcc implemented the assume attribute just the same as the standard one. While clang implemented before standardization and now they differ and could cause issues. This is why I reques

[clang] [llvm] [AArch64] Support preserve_none calling convention (PR #91046)

@@ -5658,17 +5658,20 @@ experimental at this time. def PreserveNoneDocs : Documentation { let Category = DocCatCallingConvs; let Content = [{ -On X86-64 target, this attribute changes the calling convention of a function. +On X86-64 and AArch64 targets, this attribute chang

[clang] [llvm] [AArch64] Support preserve_none calling convention (PR #91046)

pinskia wrote: I don't think you can use x16 and x17 for argument passing due to them being reserved for PLTs and call veneers. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91046 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.

[clang] [llvm] [AArch64] Add support for Qualcomm Oryon processor (PR #91022)

pinskia wrote: Note the corresponding GCC patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650664.html https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91022 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm

[clang] [clang] deprecate frelaxed-template-template-args, make it on by default (PR #89807)

pinskia wrote: Reference to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55894 . https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] nolock/noalloc attributes (PR #84983)

pinskia wrote: One question since the attribute is applied to types is there a way to get the nolock/noalloc from type?. e.g. ``` template [[nolock(T)]] void f(T a) { a(); } ``` Will the above work or is there no way to implement that currently? Since you mention it is attached to the type, is

[clang] nolock/noalloc attributes (PR #84983)

pinskia wrote: Does it make sense to have some C testcases too? Likewise some testcases testing the __attribute__ style attribute? I would say more testcases the better really. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983 ___ cfe-commits mailing li

[clang] [llvm] [ARM] __ARM_ARCH macro definition fix (PR #81493)

pinskia wrote: Note the corresponding GCC bug is at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99312 (and there was a patch posted but never reviewed; https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566322.html). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81493 _

[llvm] [clang] New calling convention preserve_none (PR #76868)

@@ -416,6 +416,12 @@ added in the future: This calling convention, like the `PreserveMost` calling convention, will be used by a future version of the ObjectiveC runtime and should be considered experimental at this time. +"``preserve_nonecc``" - The `PreserveNone`