@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
+
+// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -target-feature +sme2
-target-feature +sve -S -disable-O0-optnone -Werror -Wall -emit-ll
https://github.com/david-arm commented:
This looks good to me, but I think it needs rebasing after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72849 landed. It also looks like
@sdesmalen-arm left a comment about renaming ImmToTile - perhaps that could be
done in this patch?
https://github.com/l
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ let TargetGuard = "sme2" in {
// Spill and fill of ZT0
//
let TargetGuard = "sme2" in {
- def SVLDR_ZT : Inst<"svldr_zt", "viQ", "", MergeNone, "aarch64_sme_ldr_zt",
[IsOverloadNone, IsStreamingCompatible, IsSharedZA, IsPreservesZA],
[ImmCheck<0, ImmCheck
david-arm wrote:
Gentle ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
david-arm wrote:
Hi @AaronBallman, yes the problem I found with always choosing `char` as the
alias type is that LLVM will just assume that enum types alias with absolutely
everything. This is a conservative approach that works fine, but it does
prevent important type-based alias optimisations
david-arm wrote:
Gentle ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/david-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
>From af76f6b6b3469fd0f5f24427c5a175c8d9d7c83a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Sherwood
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:20:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Emit TBAA info for enums in C
When emitting TBAA
david-arm wrote:
> Do you think it's worth adding something to the Clang release note?
Done. Hope the documentation I added makes sense!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
david-arm wrote:
> I thought the suggestion was to add a few lines to
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
Yes you're right! For some reason I got mixed up with the LangRef, but I guess
adding something to the LangRef does no harm either. I'll put someth
https://github.com/david-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
>From af76f6b6b3469fd0f5f24427c5a175c8d9d7c83a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Sherwood
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:20:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Emit TBAA info for enums in C
When emitting TBAA
https://github.com/david-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
>From af76f6b6b3469fd0f5f24427c5a175c8d9d7c83a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Sherwood
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:20:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Emit TBAA info for enums in C
When emitting TBAA
@@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ C Language Changes
number of elements in the flexible array member. This information can improve
the results of the array bound sanitizer and the
``__builtin_dynamic_object_size`` builtin.
+- Enums will now be represented in TBAA metadata using their a
https://github.com/david-arm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -346,7 +346,9 @@ void RuntimePointerChecking::tryToCreateDiffCheck(
auto *SinkStartAR = cast(SinkStartInt);
const Loop *StartARLoop = SrcStartAR->getLoop();
if (StartARLoop == SinkStartAR->getLoop() &&
-StartARLoop == InnerLoop->getParentLoop()) {
+
https://github.com/david-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73515
>From 30251642f8c208c63f3f3097c337ef0d5bc633b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Sherwood
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 13:43:26 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [LoopVectorize] Improve algorithm for hoisting runtime
ch
david-arm wrote:
> Hi! I wonder that have you conducted any tests to determine the potential
> performance increase of this pass in the SPEC2017 557xz benchmark? I
> attempted to apply it to the xz benchmark, but only one copy(--copies=1)
> demonstrated a significant increase(about 3%), but th
https://github.com/david-arm approved this pull request.
LGTM as well!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
david-arm wrote:
Gentle ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76034
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
