muggenhor added a comment.
FYI: I've added a set of tests. But in the process discovered there's at least
one assumption that doesn't hold for boost::optional. So I'll have to adjust
the implementation for that. That's a bit more involved change, so will take
some time.
(Specifically the assum
muggenhor added a comment.
Sure. Looking at the test I'm unsure though, are the `optional` implementations
in there stripped copies of the real implementations? Or just a minimal
implementation that fits the basic optional interface in the given namespace?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
muggenhor created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: carlosgalvezp, xazax.hun.
Herald added a reviewer: NoQ.
Herald added a project: All.
muggenhor requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
