Author: Greg Bedwell
Date: 2019-10-27T09:42:14Z
New Revision: d4758d4a8d842275f4319ae278808be0bcd2ede3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4758d4a8d842275f4319ae278808be0bcd2ede3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4758d4a8d842275f4319ae278808be0bcd2ede3.diff
LOG:
> > Unfortunately this trips up a variety of buildbots:
> Platform REQUIRES added in r351360, please do revert & fix if this test
is supposed to work elsewhere.
Looks like the test fail just made it into the release-8.0.0 branch by a
few commits. I think we'll need Jeremy's fix r351360 or/and any
Hopefully these two should be good to re-enable as of r319330.
-Greg
On 29 November 2017 at 16:23, Greg Bedwell wrote:
> > Two slaves remain off for now as they produce a lot of warnings and
> their log files are way too big.
>
> I think https://reviews.llvm.org/D40603 will fix this issue.
>
>
> Two slaves remain off for now as they produce a lot of warnings and their
log files are way too big.
I think https://reviews.llvm.org/D40603 will fix this issue.
-Greg
On 28 November 2017 at 22:13, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> LLVM bui
We're seeing the same assertion failing in our internal testing (I've not
bisected to a specific change yet though, but it seems likely it's the same
thing as in the log from the modules bot). Here's a reduced example that
triggers it:
$ cat 2.h
//
tem
gbedwell added a subscriber: gbedwell.
gbedwell added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17550#360177, @probinson wrote:
> One question I have, which shouldn't block this (as we've done several like
> this already):
> Is is okay to be using C++ style comments in these headers?
> (Is there
gbedwell added a subscriber: gbedwell.
gbedwell added a comment.
> > Also, I am really curious to know why CryptAcquireContext fails in those
> > cases!
>
>
> Me too. Once is a fluke, twice is a trend. Probably some obscure
> system-resource problem but it would be nice to be sure.
I'm
Temporarily reverted in r248578 until we have implemented a solution for
the failure on the llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast bot.
On 24 September 2015 at 23:06, Ekaterina Romanova via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: kromanova
> Date: Thu Sep 24 17:06:52 2015
>
Author: gbedwell
Date: Fri Sep 25 11:11:00 2015
New Revision: 248578
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=248578&view=rev
Log:
Revert "This patch adds missing pieces to clang, including the PS4 toolchain
definition, added warnings, PS4 defaults, and Driver changes needed for our
compiler
gbedwell added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12368#233680, @hans wrote:
> Committed in r246090.
Thanks!
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/c
gbedwell created this revision.
gbedwell added reviewers: hans, rnk, aaron.ballman.
gbedwell added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This is a clang release note to match the LLVM release note in D12367.
As we're planning on raising the minimum Windows version to Windows 7 for LLVM
3.8 as per this disc
11 matches
Mail list logo
