[compiler-rt] [clang] [lldb] [clang-tools-extra] [libc] [flang] [llvm] LLDB Debuginfod usage tests (with fixes) (PR #79181)

kevinfrei wrote: > I'm wondering if shell test are really the best way to test this. For more > complex scenarios like are being tested here, we generally prefer [1] API > tests because they're more expressive and allow you to build more complicated > test binaries with our Makefile system. Th

[libc] [compiler-rt] [clang-tools-extra] [llvm] [lldb] [flang] [clang] LLDB Debuginfod usage tests (with fixes) (PR #79181)

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +# Tests for basic Debuginfod functionality + +Because the Debuginfod protocol is a simple HTTP path-based system, one can +mimic a Debuginfod server by setting up a directory structure to reflect the +protocol properly. That's how all these tests operate. We over

[mlir] [clang] [libcxx] [flang] [libc] [llvm] [clang-tools-extra] [lldb] [compiler-rt] Added settings for DEBUGINFOD cache location and timeout (PR #78605)

https://github.com/kevinfrei updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78605 >From 48c6e5edc1dc5f832f8f5c922c61af9070ad341d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Frei Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:09:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Added settings for cache location and timeout --- .../Debugi