mdavis36 wrote:
Thank you all for weighing in here. It seems there is some disagreement on how
to move forward with this. I believe the current change addresses the initial
issue this PR is tied to, which aimed to clarify this attribute affects more
than just explicit specializations defined b
https://github.com/mdavis36 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839
>From c1e9c253b863297e5e245ae9a484f4275bb1187d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mdavis36
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:32:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove "explicitly" from ambiguous documentaion on
[[clang::no_spec
https://github.com/mdavis36 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839
>From c1e9c253b863297e5e245ae9a484f4275bb1187d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mdavis36
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:32:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove "explicitly" from ambiguous documentaion on
[[clang::no_spec
https://github.com/mdavis36 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839
# Summary
This PR resolves issue #143719.
- Removes "explcitly" from the documentation on `[[clang::no_specialization]]`
to better match behavior of specialization as defined by the C++ standard.
>From c1e9c2
