https://github.com/pedroclobo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ __m64 test_mm_mul_su32(__m64 a, __m64 b) {
// CHECK: mul <2 x i64> %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
return _mm_mul_su32(a, b);
}
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(match_m64(_mm_mul_su32((__m64)(__v4hi){+1, -2, +3, -4},
(__m64)(__v4hi){-10, +8, +6, -4}), 2533154533212150));
-
https://github.com/pedroclobo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
>From 4163545d41d9e0336c6aaf32d19ceb161fbb6214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:57:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in
constexpr
pedroclobo wrote:
Should I wait for @phoebewang's review before merging?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ __m64 test_mm_mul_su32(__m64 a, __m64 b) {
// CHECK: mul <2 x i64> %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
return _mm_mul_su32(a, b);
}
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(match_v2si(_mm_mul_su32((__m64)(__v4hi){+1, -2, +3, -4},
(__m64)(__v4hi){-10, +8, +6, -4}), 1900534, 589796));
-
https://github.com/pedroclobo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
>From c38db4cec7342ea978b7d4849fe574b5b17638df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:42:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in
constexpr
@@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ __m128i test_mm_mul_epu32(__m128i A, __m128i B) {
// CHECK: mul <2 x i64> %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}
return _mm_mul_epu32(A, B);
}
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(match_v8hi(_mm_mul_epu32((__m128i)(__v8hi){+1, -2, +3, -4, +5,
-6, +7, -8}, (__m128i)(__v8hi){-16, -14, +12, +10, -8
https://github.com/pedroclobo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
>From c38db4cec7342ea978b7d4849fe574b5b17638df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:42:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in
constexpr
pedroclobo wrote:
Rebased over 08eff57444343e4081690f7947fd81f5ea862a86.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153293
>From c38db4cec7342ea978b7d4849fe574b5b17638df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:42:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in constexpr
Add
https://github.com/pedroclobo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
>From 5d3a3eca3bb6beda8bc8dbd1999c00d1d02e3105 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 11:17:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][x86] Add C++ run lines and fix constexpr tests
Some file
pedroclobo wrote:
Oh, I see you added the run lines in `avx512vpopcntdqvl-builtins.c`.
I'll rebase.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
pedroclobo wrote:
> nice catch - any idea why the test was passing?
I don't really know how to run/verify these `constexpr` tests. At least with
`ninja check-all`, they don’t seem to run in a way that clearly reports the
`static_assert` failures.
I've been relying on my editor's LSP. It flagg
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152478
The previous test incorrectly assumed 32-bit integers, leading to incorrect bit
counts. This change updates the test result to assume 64-bit integers.
>From 385fa5588bf544a3cd691cf6641f80c7d9f4a258 Mon Sep 1
https://github.com/pedroclobo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134731
Fill default values of a map with `poison` instead of `undef`. There should be
no functional difference as the default values are overridden later.
>From de69ee35e12babf55f6a0212200431bf75340dc4 Mon Sep 17 0
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131689
Call `insertelement` on a `poison` value instead of `undef`.
>From f90247df8bbb6e24aab4476ea8ef9ef5d990edb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:50:51 +
Subject: [PATCH] [A
https://github.com/pedroclobo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131533
Return a `poison` value, instead of `undef`, if there is no available SEH info.
>From 6c231b0dba091d6f7c5b79a92dedeeb56166fd8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:14:30 +
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131469
Replace `undef` constant metadata uses with `poison`.
>From 7df6eb58c29f35eef3845c3ba5f76edb902272f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:10:34 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Metadata
pedroclobo wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up! I've skimmed through the [Arm Architecture Reference
Manual for A-profile
architecture](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/latest/) but what
I've found is rather inconclusive.
Section B1.4.5.3 states that "_Merging predication is perform
pedroclobo wrote:
cc @nunoplopes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pedroclobo wrote:
cc @nunoplopes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120446
Call `insertvalue` with a `poison` operand instead of `undef`.
>From eac0aa0d6a60a61a4312b248229aa94559ca5add Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Lobo
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:58:46 +
Subject: [PATCH]
pedroclobo wrote:
cc @nunoplopes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119141
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pedroclobo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119141
- Use `poison `instead of `undef` as a phi operand from an unreachable block.
- Call `@llvm.vector.insert` with a `poison` subvec when performing a `bitcast`
from a fixed vector to a scalable vector.
>From c
pedroclobo wrote:
cc @nunoplopes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pedroclobo wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117064
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
32 matches
Mail list logo
