seanm wrote:
@bwendling thanks for your reply. No idea how representative it is of other
projects, but 3 of the 6 flexible arrays in
[libusb](https://github.com/libusb/libusb) structures have these kinds of
non-trivial counts.
The GCC folks seem to have
seanm wrote:
@bwendling is there any plan / possibility for simple expressions (with no side
effects)? Like:
```c
struct libusb_bos_dev_capability_descriptor {
uint8_t bLength;
uint8_t bDescriptorType;
uint8_t bDevCapabilityType;
uint8_t
Friendly ping... this is a very trivial documentation patch...
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:57:07 -0400, Sean McBride via cfe-commits said:
>Fixed incorrect docs that referred to:
> objc_arc_weak_unavailable
>when it should be:
> objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
>
&
Fixed incorrect docs that referred to:
objc_arc_weak_unavailable
when it should be:
objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
Cheers,
Sean
objc_arc_weak_unavailable-typo.patch
Description: Binary data
___
cfe-commits mailing list
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:48:56 +, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits said:
>Actually, did you think about adding this as a clang diagnostic?
>
>Richard, what do you think about complaining in Clang about `int i =
>true;` kind of code?
If you don't mind a lurker interjecting... :) I think
