https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
anematode wrote:
Sorry about that, should work now...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
anematode wrote:
h why did it fail
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
anematode wrote:
done :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
>From d36dcec834f1846f050b89650b31bee4e138ddc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:11:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] [Sema] Check argument range for prefetchi*
intr
https://github.com/anematode created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149745
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/144857 . I can create a test
if desired, but I think the fix is trivial enough.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aaee8e5f-6e65-4f04-b8b9-e4ae1434d95
@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ static const void *ptr = 0o0; /* ext-warning {{octal integer
literals are a C2y
#endif
// 0 by itself is not deprecated, of course.
-int k = 0;
+int k1 = 0;
+long k2 = 0l;
+unsigned long long k3 = 0ull;
anematode wrote:
i like ur attitude
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149688
>From 5def3c282d446e6ac687cdef37710e9545814cbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:55:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Don't warn on zero literals with -std=c2y
Fixes
https://github.com/anematode created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149688
Fixes #149669; the old check compared with the end of the literal, but we can
just check that after parsing digits, we're pointing to one character past the
token start.
>From 5def3c282d446e6ac687cdef37710e9
anematode wrote:
Pardon? (Last time I made a PR my commit was merged directly, but I don't mind
if you commit a trivial one like this)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
@@ -1211,6 +1211,15 @@ WebAssemblyTargetLowering::LowerCall(CallLoweringInfo
&CLI,
}
}
}
+
+// If outgoing arguments are passed via the stack, we cannot tail call
+for (const ISD::OutputArg &Out : CLI.Outs) {
anematode wrote:
Whoops!
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124365
>From 2508da6fd7f38101011573460724f13df1c1616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:13:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][docs] Fix typos concerning wasm __funcref
---
clan
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124365
>From 2508da6fd7f38101011573460724f13df1c1616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:13:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][docs] Fix typos concerning wasm __funcref
---
https://github.com/anematode created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124365
The docs conflate `__funcref` with an actual type in a couple places.
>From 2508da6fd7f38101011573460724f13df1c1616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:13:30 -0800
Subjec
anematode wrote:
It's used 100+ more times through the macro `_RET_IP_`.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/instruction_pointer.h#L7
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/kasan.h#L164 has
some example uses where `always_inline` is important for
anematode wrote:
> Although I seem to remember having seen code that uses `always_inline` in
> order to force `__builtin_return_address` to actually apply to its caller.
Right; that's why I thought just disabling inlining would be a suboptimal
choice, although I guess you could have `always_in
anematode wrote:
> I'm seeing evidence that this might be a chatty diagnostic in practice:
>
> https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/torvalds/linux@90d35da658da8cff0d4ecbb5113f5fac9d00eb72/-/blob/kernel/fork.c?L311
>
> https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/torvalds/linux@90d35da658da8cff0d4ecbb5113f
https://github.com/anematode edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
>From e5646f3f4967847ef68d428c84b30dbd4d2e8e49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:21:40 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add noinline check for __builtin_frame_address and
__builtin
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
>From cd68484e851040fc84e66933454f6fd910566b81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:21:40 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add noinline check for __builtin_frame_address and
__builtin
https://github.com/anematode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
>From ef4c372a4d9364e6457c88a940c9af8666de0b74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timothy Herchen
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:01:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add noinline check for __builtin_frame_address and
__builtin
https://github.com/anematode created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82966
Will resolve https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/66059 . GCC's behavior
in the case of inlining
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Return-Address.html) is that a caller's
return/frame address may be
29 matches
Mail list logo
