https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I'm happy that we stop issuing diagnostics that contradict each other.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
@@ -99,6 +99,20 @@ C++ Specific Potentially Breaking Changes
// Was error, now evaluates to false.
constexpr bool b = f() == g();
+- The warning ``-Wdeprecated-literal-operator`` is now on by default, as this
is
+ something that WG21 has shown interest in removing fr
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ namespace cwg1762 { // cwg1762: 14
float operator ""E(const char *);
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{invalid suffix on literal; C++11 requires a space
between literal and identifier}}
// since-cxx11-warning@-2 {{user-defined literal suffixes not starting wi
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ namespace cwg1762 { // cwg1762: 14
float operator ""E(const char *);
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{invalid suffix on literal; C++11 requires a space
between literal and identifier}}
// since-cxx11-warning@-2 {{user-defined literal suffixes not starting wi
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
The rest of changes to DR tests look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ namespace std {
#endif
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2707 { // cwg2707: 20
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+template struct A { // #cwg2707-A
+ T value[N];
+};
+
+template
+A(T...) -> A requires (sizeof...(T) == 2); //
#cwg2707-guide-A
+
+// Brace eli
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ namespace std {
#endif
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2707 { // cwg2707: 20
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+template struct A { // #cwg2707-A
+ T value[N];
+};
+
+template
+A(T...) -> A requires (sizeof...(T) == 2); //
#cwg2707-guide-A
+
+// Brace eli
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
LGTM otherwise
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
LGTM otherwise
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #cwg357-A
void f() const; // #cwg357-f
};
template void A::f() {}
// expected-error@-1 {{out-of-line
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -102,12 +102,13 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
// default argument -- how far back do we look when determining whether a
// parameter was expanded from a pack?
// -- zygoloid 2020-06-02
- template struct B {
+ template struct B { // #defined-here
temp
@@ -597,9 +597,10 @@ namespace cwg336 { // cwg336: yes
void mf2();
};
};
-template<> template class A::B {};
+template<> template class A::B {}; // #defined-here-cwg336
Endilll wrote:
```suggestion
template<> template class A::B {
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #defined-here-cwg357-A
void f() const; // #cwg357-f
};
template void A::f() {}
// expected-error@-1
@@ -758,16 +759,18 @@ namespace cwg347 { // cwg347: yes
void g();
};
- struct derived : base {};
+ struct derived : base {}; // #defined-here-derived
struct derived::nested {};
// expected-error@-1 {{no struct named 'nested' in 'cwg347::derived'}}
int derive
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #defined-here-cwg357-A
Endilll wrote:
```suggestion
template struct A { // #cwg357-A
```
http
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #defined-here-cwg357-A
void f() const; // #cwg357-f
};
template void A::f() {}
// expected-error@-1
@@ -758,16 +759,18 @@ namespace cwg347 { // cwg347: yes
void g();
};
- struct derived : base {};
+ struct derived : base {}; // #defined-here-derived
struct derived::nested {};
// expected-error@-1 {{no struct named 'nested' in 'cwg347::derived'}}
int derive
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #defined-here-cwg357-A
void f() const; // #cwg357-f
};
template void A::f() {}
// expected-error@-1
@@ -102,12 +102,13 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
// default argument -- how far back do we look when determining whether a
// parameter was expanded from a pack?
// -- zygoloid 2020-06-02
- template struct B {
+ template struct B { // #defined-here
-
@@ -1009,18 +1012,20 @@ namespace cwg355 { struct ::cwg355_S s; }
// cwg356: na
namespace cwg357 { // cwg357: yes
- template struct A {
+ template struct A { // #defined-here-cwg357-A
void f() const; // #cwg357-f
};
template void A::f() {}
// expected-error@-1
@@ -758,16 +759,18 @@ namespace cwg347 { // cwg347: yes
void g();
};
- struct derived : base {};
+ struct derived : base {}; // #defined-here-derived
Endilll wrote:
```suggestion
struct derived : base {}; // #cwg347-derived
```
https://github.com/l
@@ -597,9 +597,10 @@ namespace cwg336 { // cwg336: yes
void mf2();
};
};
-template<> template class A::B {};
+template<> template class A::B {}; // #defined-here-cwg336
template<> template<> template void A::B::mf1(T t) {}
// expected-error@-
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
template<> template
void B::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {}
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'f' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg2233::MultilevelSpecialization::B'}}
+//
@@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ namespace cwg336 { // cwg336: yes
template<> template class A::B {};
template<> template<> template void A::B::mf1(T t) {}
// expected-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'mf1' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg336::Pre::A::B'}}
+// exp
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Implementation seems fine to me, but wait for other reviewers before merging.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -231,6 +245,10 @@ linux_projects_to_test=$(exclude-linux
$(compute-projects-to-test ${modified_pro
linux_check_targets=$(check-targets ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
linux_projects=$(add-dependencies ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
+linux_runtimes_to_tes
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2454,7 +2480,7 @@ def element_type(self):
If accessed on a type that is not an array, complex, or vector type, an
exception will be raised.
"""
-result = conf.lib.clang_getElementType(self)
+result = Type.from_result(conf.lib.clang_ge
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -231,6 +245,10 @@ linux_projects_to_test=$(exclude-linux
$(compute-projects-to-test ${modified_pro
linux_check_targets=$(check-targets ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
linux_projects=$(add-dependencies ${linux_projects_to_test} | sort | uniq)
+linux_runtimes_to_tes
@@ -357,6 +359,50 @@ def test_is_restrict_qualified(self):
self.assertTrue(i.type.is_restrict_qualified())
self.assertFalse(j.type.is_restrict_qualified())
+def test_get_result(self):
+tu = get_tu("void foo(); int bar(char, short);")
+foo =
@@ -279,6 +280,90 @@ def test_is_default_method(self):
self.assertTrue(xc.is_default_method())
self.assertFalse(yc.is_default_method())
+def test_is_deleted_method(self):
+source = "class X { X() = delete; }; class Y { Y(); };"
+tu = get_tu(
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I have to admit I can't assess the completeness of those tests, but they are
certainly welcome. Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ def test_diagnostic_fixit(self):
self.assertEqual(tu.diagnostics[0].location.column, 26)
self.assertRegex(tu.diagnostics[0].spelling, "use of GNU old-style.*")
self.assertEqual(len(tu.diagnostics[0].fixits), 1)
+with self.assert
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109846
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -625,6 +762,25 @@ def test_result_type_objc_method_decl(self):
self.assertEqual(cursor.kind, CursorKind.OBJC_INSTANCE_METHOD_DECL)
self.assertEqual(result_type.kind, TypeKind.VOID)
+def test_storage_class(self):
+tu = get_tu(
+"""
+ex
@@ -279,6 +280,90 @@ def test_is_default_method(self):
self.assertTrue(xc.is_default_method())
self.assertFalse(yc.is_default_method())
+def test_is_deleted_method(self):
+source = "class X { X() = delete; }; class Y { Y(); };"
+tu = get_tu(
@@ -357,6 +359,50 @@ def test_is_restrict_qualified(self):
self.assertTrue(i.type.is_restrict_qualified())
self.assertFalse(j.type.is_restrict_qualified())
+def test_get_result(self):
+tu = get_tu("void foo(); int bar(char, short);")
+foo =
@@ -357,6 +359,50 @@ def test_is_restrict_qualified(self):
self.assertTrue(i.type.is_restrict_qualified())
self.assertFalse(j.type.is_restrict_qualified())
+def test_get_result(self):
+tu = get_tu("void foo(); int bar(char, short);")
+foo =
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1952,6 +1952,8 @@ def enum_value(self):
underlying_type = self.type
if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ENUM:
underlying_type = underlying_type.get_declaration().enum_type
+if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ELABORATED:
-
@@ -1952,6 +1952,8 @@ def enum_value(self):
underlying_type = self.type
if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ENUM:
underlying_type = underlying_type.get_declaration().enum_type
+if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ELABORATED:
-
@@ -1952,6 +1952,8 @@ def enum_value(self):
underlying_type = self.type
if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ENUM:
underlying_type = underlying_type.get_declaration().enum_type
+if underlying_type.kind == TypeKind.ELABORATED:
-
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Hm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
> That was always true, in the sense that there's nothing preventing the author
> from doing the exact same thing: looking at the output from the clang -verify
> failure and adding/removing expected diagnostics until it matches. In fact,
> even without this script that is the mo
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll: I've removed the other changes from `cxx_dr_status.html` manually
> from this commit. Can you create the separate patch to add the new cwg
> issues? Thanks!
Pushed 88a9bcaf7074d21aa818cfa3952300dc9547be77
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108817
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll: I've removed the other changes from `cxx_dr_status.html` manually
> from this commit. Can you create the separate patch to add the new cwg
> issues? Thanks!
Pushed 331d65d0e271d22da9f496f2bb628b93ab515725
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108817
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-09-17T12:12:49+03:00
New Revision: 88a9bcaf7074d21aa818cfa3952300dc9547be77
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88a9bcaf7074d21aa818cfa3952300dc9547be77
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88a9bcaf7074d21aa818cfa3952300dc9547be77.
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
LGTM, but it would be nice for @cor3ntin to rubber-stamp it before merging.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108817
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
Endilll wrote:
> Should I add tests for all of these first, and then merge that into this PR?
That would be nice!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
@@ -3524,16 +3564,20 @@ def getCompileCommands(self, filename):
Get an iterable object providing all the CompileCommands available to
build filename. Returns None if filename is not found in the database.
"""
-return conf.lib.clang_CompilationDat
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3743,82 +3765,62 @@ def write_main_file_to_stdout(self):
("clang_equalLocations", [SourceLocation, SourceLocation], bool),
("clang_equalRanges", [SourceRange, SourceRange], bool),
("clang_equalTypes", [Type, Type], bool),
-("clang_formatDiagnostic", [Diagnos
@@ -2454,7 +2480,7 @@ def element_type(self):
If accessed on a type that is not an array, complex, or vector type, an
exception will be raised.
"""
-result = conf.lib.clang_getElementType(self)
+result = Type.from_result(conf.lib.clang_ge
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Any chance you were able to test those changes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105490
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107397
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107397
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -626,6 +626,11 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
const llvm::MapVector &
getMismatchingDeleteExpressions() const;
+ std::vector>
+ ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied;
Endilll wrote:
Or `(Num >1 ? 1 : 0)` if you wany
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107397
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1180,6 +1180,16 @@ void Sema::PrintPragmaAttributeInstantiationPoint() {
diag::note_pragma_attribute_applied_decl_here);
}
+void Sema::DiagnoseExcessPrecision() {
+ if (NumExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied > 0) {
+for (auto &[Loc, Type, Num] : ExcessPrecision
@@ -626,6 +626,11 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
const llvm::MapVector &
getMismatchingDeleteExpressions() const;
+ std::vector>
+ ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied;
Endilll wrote:
I think all three data members should be moved down to `SemaExpr.
@@ -1180,6 +1180,16 @@ void Sema::PrintPragmaAttributeInstantiationPoint() {
diag::note_pragma_attribute_applied_decl_here);
}
+void Sema::DiagnoseExcessPrecision() {
+ if (NumExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied > 0) {
+for (auto &[Loc, Type, Num] : ExcessPrecision
@@ -206,19 +206,28 @@ namespace cwg1814 { // cwg1814: yes
#endif
}
-namespace cwg1815 { // cwg1815: no
+namespace cwg1815 { // cwg1815: 19
Endilll wrote:
Seems to be the case, yeah.
>From what I see, this effort was started back before 19 has branched, and wa
@@ -15099,6 +15037,106 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
std::string getFixItZeroLiteralForType(QualType T, SourceLocation Loc) const;
///@}
+
+ //
Endilll wrote:
Yes, this is consistent with the rest of Sema.h
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107019
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107131
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107131
[CWG2486](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2486.html) "Call to `noexcept`
function via `noexcept(false)` pointer/lvalue" allows `noexcept` functions to
be called via `noexcept(false)` pointers or values.
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107019
This patch covers Core issues about language linkage during declaration
matching resolved in
[P1787R6](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1787r6.html),
namely [CWG563](https://cplusplus.
Endilll wrote:
The failure is unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
@cor3ntin Can you take another look? I added CWG1900 section to the PR
description. Nothing has changes for other Core issues.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
>From 65307bd2f5f8ca5c6aaa24335c77a63280d668e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:45:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues about friend declarati
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
Thank you for resolving your issue the hard way, and paying some of the
technical debt we accumulated over the years.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -204,6 +204,24 @@ class SemaPPCallbacks;
class TemplateDeductionInfo;
} // namespace sema
+// AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+// to represent what is actually causing the operation
+enum class AssignmentAction : unsigned {
+ Assi
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll This is my attempt at implementing what you asked for in [#106321
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321#discussion_r1734379624)
>
> I'm not a huge fan of this as I think this will be extremely annoying for
> downstream forks with very little up
@@ -204,6 +204,24 @@ class SemaPPCallbacks;
class TemplateDeductionInfo;
} // namespace sema
+// AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+// to represent what is actually causing the operation
+enum class AssignmentAction : unsigned {
---
Endilll wrote:
Here's an example:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/114ff99e93edd699fd94cf2a84de75e8845fc76b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg10xx.cpp#L85-L90
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102878
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
Endilll wrote:
> @cor3ntin The solution here #79748 doesn't pass the test too. Kinda expected
> not to pass the test clang
If tests are not intended to pass, you should expect the diagnostics we issue
today, and leave FIXMEs appropriately to indicate where Clang's behavior is
wrong.
https://
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -568,6 +568,80 @@ namespace cwg137 { // cwg137: yes
const volatile int *cvqcv = static_cast(cvp);
}
+namespace cwg138 { // cwg138: partial
+namespace example1 {
+void foo(); // #cwg138-ex1-foo
+namespace A {
+ using example1::foo; // #cwg138-ex1-using
+ class X {
+s
@@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
+template
+struct B {
+ static_assert(sizeof(T) == 1);
+ using type = int;
+};
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106360
This patch updates `make_cxx_dr_status` script to use the same spoiler-like way
to hide additional details that `cxx_status.html` uses. This gives implemented
yet unresolved DRs new but very familiar look:
![s9
@@ -2099,6 +2099,70 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E, bool CountInBytes,
bool OrNull);
+ // AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+ // to repr
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
-namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 open 2024-07-30
+namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 review 2024-07-30
Endi
@@ -17292,43 +17292,43 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2913.html";>2913
-open
+tentatively ready
Grammar for deduction-guide has requires-clause in the
wrong position
Not resolved
https
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -pedantic-errors -verify=expected %s
-namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 open 2024-07-30
+namespace cwg2917 { // cwg2917: 20 review 2024-07-30
Endi
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void *operator new(std::size_t, void *p) { return p; }
void* operator new[] (std::size_t, void* p) {return p;}
-namespace cwg2922 { // cwg2922: 20 open 2024-07-10
+namespace cwg2922 { // cwg2922: 20 tentatively ready 2024-07-10
Endilll wrote
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106299
[CWG2917](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2917.html) got a new proposed
resolution that is different from the one the test has been written against.
[CWG2922](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2922.
1 - 100 of 1390 matches
Mail list logo
