[PATCH] D113622: [analyzer] support ignoring use-after-free checking with reference_counted attribute

aaron.ballman added a comment. In D113622#3193319 , @chrisdangelo wrote: > Hi @aaron.ballman, > > It's nice to meet you, virtually. Nice to meet you as well, and I'm very sorry that this review took so long for me to get to. It fell off my radar for a

[PATCH] D113622: [analyzer] support ignoring use-after-free checking with reference_counted attribute

steakhal added a comment. In D113622#3195985 , @NoQ wrote: > In D113622#3194580 , @steakhal > wrote: > >> Could you please share the results to have look? How can I reproduce and >> evaluate the effect of this c

[PATCH] D113622: [analyzer] support ignoring use-after-free checking with reference_counted attribute

NoQ added a comment. In D113622#3194580 , @steakhal wrote: > Could you please share the results to have look? How can I reproduce and > evaluate the effect of this change? You'll need a project that uses a lot of manual reference counting, typically in

[PATCH] D113622: [analyzer] support ignoring use-after-free checking with reference_counted attribute

steakhal added a comment. In D113622#3193319 , @chrisdangelo wrote: > I've successfully exercised these changes against a large C / C++ project and > studied the output with @NoQ. Could you please share the results to have look? How can I reproduce and