bruno closed this revision.
bruno added a comment.
Done way back in r248932
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D13117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dexonsmith added a comment.
Sorry for the review fragmentation, but I just noticed there's no test
for the new warning. Can you add one? After that, LGTM.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
Sorry for the review fragmentation, but I just noticed there's no test
for the new warning. Can you add one? After that, LGTM.
> On 2015-Sep-24, at 11:57, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
>
> bruno updated this revision to Diff 35664.
> bruno added a comment.
>
> Added test per Duncan's comment.
>
bruno updated this revision to Diff 35664.
bruno added a comment.
Added test per Duncan's comment.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13117
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.td
lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
test/Driver/darwin-ld.c
Index: test/Driver/darwin-ld.c
===
The code LGTM, but there ought to be a way to add a LIT test for this.
Looking for -object_path_lto, I found this:
--
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-apple-darwin10 -### %s \
// RUN: -mlinker-version=117 -flto 2> %t.log
// RUN: cat %t.log
// RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=LINK_OBJECT_LTO_PATH %s < %
dexonsmith added a subscriber: dexonsmith.
dexonsmith added a comment.
The code LGTM, but there ought to be a way to add a LIT test for this.
Looking for -object_path_lto, I found this:
---
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-apple-darwin10 -### %s \
// RUN: -
bruno created this revision.
bruno added a reviewer: dexonsmith.
bruno added subscribers: cfe-commits, kledzik, bob.wilson.
bruno set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
Usually, when using LTO with a clang installation newer than the system one,
there's a libLTO.dylib version mismatch a
