[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

rengolin added a comment. I think we can safely say that we care less about jazelle than we care about armv1/2/3, so feel free to ignore that, too. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109 ___

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

DavidSpickett added subscribers: nickdesaulniers, psmith. DavidSpickett added a comment. > 1:38 AM might be good to take them out here as well So I looked into this. Here are the Arm architectures that clang has that gcc doesn't: "armv5tej" // Not in GCC, j = jazelle "armv7k" // Apple Watch S1 "

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGe428baf0019e: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M (authored by DavidSpickett). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109/new/ http

Re: [PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

Arnd mentions on IRC: 1:38 AM ndesaulniers: I just looked at the patch and found that the list of supported targets still includes armv5 and armve (both without t), which never existed in hardware and were removed from gcc a while ago 1:38 AM might be good to take them out here as well 1:38 AM

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

rengolin accepted this revision. rengolin added a comment. Agree. Even 10 years ago we made the concerted effort not to care about pre-v4, so I'd be a little surprised if people are actually using modern clang to target those platforms. Projects that rely on it can work in the same way as gcc a

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

DavidSpickett added a comment. This is probably overkill but I posted an RFC just in case https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-removal-of-armv2-2a-3-3m-target-options/65040. Like I said, no rush to land this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.o

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

nickdesaulniers accepted this revision. nickdesaulniers added a comment. For the Linux kernel, we're only building v5+ continuously. It looks like the Linux kernel supports v4+ and v3m (for Acorn Risc-PC (Intel StrongARM(R) SA-110)). We've never been able to build that target, and it's not high

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

peter.smith accepted this revision. peter.smith added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM. GCC no longer supports Arm architecture prior to v4 so it is likely the alternative of adding support for v3 is not worth it. The only Arm machines running v2 are likely to be

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

DavidSpickett added reviewers: psmith, easyaspi314. DavidSpickett added a comment. The remaining reference in the repo is a #define in `openmp/runtime/src/kmp_platform.h` which seems harmless. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109/ne

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

DavidSpickett added a comment. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57486 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133109 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cf

[PATCH] D133109: [LLVM][ARM] Remove options for armv2, 2A, 3 and 3M

DavidSpickett created this revision. Herald added subscribers: hiraditya, kristof.beyls. Herald added a project: All. DavidSpickett requested review of this revision. Herald added projects: clang, LLVM. Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits. Fixes #57486 These pre v4 architectures a