eopXD created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: luke, VincentWu, vkmr, frasercrmck, evandro,
luismarques, apazos, sameer.abuasal, s.egerton, Jim, benna, psnobl, jocewei,
PkmX, the_o, brucehoult, MartinMosbeck, rogfer01, edward-jones, zzheng, jrtc27,
shiva0217, kito-cheng, niosHD, sabuasal
eopXD updated this revision to Diff 490416.
eopXD added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: arphaman.
Update test cases under test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv-intrinsics-handcrafted
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142085/new/
https://reviews.
eopXD updated this revision to Diff 490417.
eopXD added a comment.
Bump CI.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142085/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142085
Files:
clang/include/clang/Basic/riscv_vector.td
clang/lib/Support/RISCVVInt
kito-cheng added a comment.
Could you split testcase update to a separated patch?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142085/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142085
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
craig.topper added inline comments.
Comment at:
clang/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv-intrinsics-autogenerated/non-policy/non-overloaded/vaadd.c:5-14
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-RV64 %s
#include
-// CHECK-RV64-LABEL: @test_vaadd_vv_i8mf8(
+// CHECK-RV64-LABEL: @test__
craig.topper added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/riscv_vector.td:1535
enum RVV_CSR {
RVV_VSTART = 0,
RVV_VXSAT,
Not related to this patch, but this enum should probably be using double
underscores for its names.
Repository:
rG
jrtc27 added a comment.
(For some reason Phab won't let me comment inline from the Changeset View page,
just does nothing when I click reply or click a line...)
Or just leave the test names alone? The __riscv_ is for namespacing the
intrinsics, you don't need to namespace the tests when they're
eopXD added a comment.
> Not related to this patch, but this enum should probably be using double
> underscores for its names.
Thanks for mentioning this, probably should start a PR under rvv-intrinsic-doc
before having a patch here.
@craig.topper @kito-cheng I don't have a preference here, is
kito-cheng added a comment.
> I don't have a preference here, is any of __riscv_RVV_CSR/
> __riscv_rvv_csr_type / __riscv_rvv_csr_t suitable?
Either is fine to me at this stage, I expect they will be drop soon.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.
kito-cheng added a comment.
Agree with @jrtc27 about the test function name, we could keep the function
name in the test file, that's also reduce lots of diff which is not really
necessary.
e.g.
`vint8mf8_t test_vaadd_vv_i8mf8(vint8mf8_t op1, vint8mf8_t op2, size_t vl)`
keep same name rather t
10 matches
Mail list logo